New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
improvement of the feedback_edge_set method #23989
Comments
Branch: u/dcoudert/23989 |
comment:1
I have also added a pre-processing to solve the problem on each strongly connected component. New commits:
|
Commit: |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:3
This method has never returned labeled edges, so I have removed labels of loops. |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
comment:5
I added some comments for graphs with multiple edges (mostly to convince myself that it's correct). This patch also fix the following issue for graphs with loops.
|
Reviewer: Travis Scrimshaw |
comment:6
LGTM. |
comment:7
Thank you very much. |
Changed branch from u/dcoudert/23989 to |
As for #23984, we speed up the resolution of the constraint generation formulation adding more constraints per round, i.e., as many constraints as edge disjoint circuits.
Before
After
This patch also fix an issue for digraphs with loops (see [#23989 comment:5])
Component: graph theory
Author: David Coudert
Branch/Commit:
972edd0
Reviewer: Travis Scrimshaw
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/23989
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: