New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
inconsistent interval evaluation of pFq #24355
Comments
comment:1
The balls are suspiciously precise. It looks like it's going through
|
comment:2
The underlying problem here is in the RBF
In this case step 3 goes horribly wrong because the first operand of hypergeometric((1, 1, 1, 1, 1), (3/2, 2, 2, 2), 1/8) is a tuple and any attempt to convert it to a RealBall is doomed to failure. This coupled with the fact that the RealBall field does not implement the hypergeometric functions (connecting arb_hypgeom_pfq to RealBall seems straightforward, but connecting that somehow to symbolic.expression seems problematic). Which basically means that this is all over my head. The fact that step 4 succeeds but gives an incorrect answer suggests that there are similar problems with RIF. |
Replying to @mezzarobba:
Now fixed by making the conversion raise an error, probably in #28517 or one of its dependencies. It may still be nice to implement the correct conversion. |
Add support for conversion of the hypergeometric symbolic function to ball fields, e.g.
CC: @deinst
Component: numerical
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/24355
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: