Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

strongly regular tournaments #24682

Closed
dimpase opened this issue Feb 7, 2018 · 11 comments · Fixed by #34986
Closed

strongly regular tournaments #24682

dimpase opened this issue Feb 7, 2018 · 11 comments · Fixed by #34986

Comments

@dimpase
Copy link
Member

dimpase commented Feb 7, 2018

This is a followup to #24045:

This is generalisation of Paley digraphs from #24045, due to A.Duval, ​J.Comb.Th. 47(1988) pp. 71-100, nowadays called strongly regular digraph/tournament. We can use code in comment 14 of #24045, and Paley would be a subcase (in fact, this code will give you Paley if 4n-1 happens to be a prime power).

Component: graph theory

Author: Matteo Cati

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/24682

@dimpase dimpase added this to the sage-8.2 milestone Feb 7, 2018
@mkoeppe mkoeppe removed this from the sage-8.2 milestone Dec 29, 2022
@MatteoCati
Copy link
Contributor

Author: Matteo Cati

@MatteoCati
Copy link
Contributor

Commit: 4cd5664

@MatteoCati
Copy link
Contributor

New commits:

4cd5664Add construction of strongly regular digraph

@MatteoCati
Copy link
Contributor

@dcoudert
Copy link
Contributor

comment:3

You assume the existence of a unique strongly regular digraph of order n. Is it the case ?

  • n+1 -> n + 1
  • f'Strongly regular digraph' -> 'Strongly regular digraph'

@dimpase
Copy link
Member Author

dimpase commented Jan 30, 2023

comment:4

no, they are usually not unique (IIRC, already for 19 nodes it's not the case)

@dimpase
Copy link
Member Author

dimpase commented Jan 30, 2023

comment:5

But where do you see a uniqueness promise? The docs say

Return a Strongly Regular digraph with `n` vertices.`

@dcoudert
Copy link
Contributor

comment:6

I haven't seen any promise on the uniqueness. I just observed that the construction always returns the same digraph of order n.
You could add in the documentation for future work to add other constructions.

@dimpase
Copy link
Member Author

dimpase commented Jan 30, 2023

comment:7

yes, it's the same for many other combinatorics and graphs constructions.
E.g. if you ask for a Hadamard matrix of order n you get the 1st found, or if you ask got a strongly regular graph with the given parameters you get the 1st founds, same for block designs, orthogonal arrays, etc.

(the trac is read-only for all, except me, now, we'll get back to this on GitHub :-))

@dimpase
Copy link
Member Author

dimpase commented Jan 30, 2023

comment:8

test+1

@mkoeppe
Copy link
Member

mkoeppe commented Feb 12, 2023

Removed branch from the issue description because it has been replaced by PR #34986

vbraun pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 19, 2023
Fixes #24682.

URL: #34986
Reported by: MatteoCati
Reviewer(s): David Coudert
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants