New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
coRSK algorithm #25070
Comments
Commit: |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. This was a forced push. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Changed branch from public/combinat/dualRSK to public/combinat/dualRSK_alt-25070 |
comment:5
My attempt at a version which blends dual RSK together with RSK. Note the changes are relatively minimal. New commits:
|
comment:6
Note to myself that (additionally!) adding dual RSK to Although this should be done, the proper solution would be #24659, which unfortunately turns out to be tricky. |
comment:7
Hi, |
comment:8
Don't worry, it's my own notation and everyone calls it differently. See the second solution to Exercise 2.7.12(a) in http://www.cip.ifi.lmu.de/~grinberg/algebra/HopfComb-sols.pdf or construction (1d) in Appendix A.4 of Fulton's Young tableaux book. You don't have to reimplement it as I haven't implemented it in the first place (this ticket only does dual RSK). |
Changed keywords from IMA coding sprint, tableaux, permutations to gsocRSK, IMA coding sprint, tableaux, permutations |
Changed branch from public/combinat/dualRSK_alt-25070 to u/gh-ChamanAgrawal/25070_coRSK |
Last 10 new commits:
|
Changed author from Darij Grinberg, Tom Roby to Darij Grinberg, Tom Roby, Chaman Agrawal |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Changed keywords from gsocRSK, IMA coding sprint, tableaux, permutations to gsocRSK, IMA coding sprint, tableaux, permutations, fpsac2019 |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:19
There is a docbuild failure reported on the patchbot, likely from these things:
and
In the first case, I would make it
(also note that Also, typo - Checking that tableaux should be of same shape::
+ Checking that the tableaux should be of same shape:: and
|
Changed reviewer from Darij Grinberg, Travis Scrimshaw, to Darij Grinberg, Travis Scrimshaw |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:21
Done, thanks! |
comment:22
Now let's just wait for the patchbot. If that comes back (essentially) green, then this is a positive review. |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:26
Green patchbot. I just trivially fixed the pyflakes warnings, and I am allowing myself to set a positive review. Thank you all. |
Changed branch from public/ticket/25070 to |
Implement the dual RSK and coRSK algorithms from {0, 1}-matrices.
Depends on #27852
CC: @sagetrac-troby @tscrim
Component: combinatorics
Keywords: gsocRSK, IMA coding sprint, tableaux, permutations, fpsac2019
Author: Darij Grinberg, Tom Roby, Chaman Agrawal
Branch/Commit:
739aa17
Reviewer: Darij Grinberg, Travis Scrimshaw
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/25070
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: