-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 454
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Clarify and enhance descriptive statistics (and more) #29663
Comments
Dependencies: #29662 |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
comment:3
I use pandas pretty heavily from within Sage (Python 2.7 version). The only problem I encounter has to do with pandas not recognizing Sage's Integer as an integer. Assuming one has the standard preparser on, you have to do things like:
to keep it happy. |
comment:4
Hmm, yeah that is exactly the kind of problem I expected ( |
comment:5
Replying to @kcrisman:
Yes, I just use |
comment:6
Replying to @NathanDunfield:
I added
to pandas/core/indexes/{base,range}.py |
We have some basic statistics functionality in sage stats for some descriptive statistics. Unfortunately, it is really basic.
This ticket is for clarifying the relationship of that material to the Sage probability distributions,
histogram
, Scipy, GSL, and other libraries - perhaps including pandas, though this is not (yet) standard in Sage.Integer
s or even stranger objects, as-is.If all of those generate interest, this ticket would be converted to a metaticket to keep track of them.
Depends on #29662
CC: @NathanDunfield
Component: statistics
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29663
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: