We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
>> x86-Linux-fc (cicero) >> >> The following tests failed: >> >> sage -t "devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/complex_roots.py" > > Could you send the output of this test failing? sage -t "devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/complex_roots.py" ********************************************************************** File "/home/mariah/sage/sage-3.4-x86-Linux-fc/devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/c omplex_roots.py", line 271: sage: complex_roots(x^2 + 27*x + 181) Expected: [(-14.61803398874990?..., 1), (-12.3819660112501...? + 0.?e-27*I, 1)] Got: [(-12.3819660112501?, 1), (-14.61803398874990? + 0.?e-27*I, 1)] ********************************************************************** 1 items had failures:
CC: @sagetrac-cwitty
Component: doctest coverage
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/5559
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is "only" a problem with gcc 4.3.3.
Cheers,
Michael
Sorry, something went wrong.
This is a 3.4.1 blocker if there ever was one :)
After chatting to cwitty about this problem a couple weeks ago: we can just use another polynomial since the specific choice is irrelevant.
This is a dupe of #5378.
sagetrac-mabshoff
No branches or pull requests
CC: @sagetrac-cwitty
Component: doctest coverage
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/5559
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: