Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

roots issue on fedora core 32-bit and gcc 4.3.3 #5559

Closed
williamstein opened this issue Mar 18, 2009 · 4 comments
Closed

roots issue on fedora core 32-bit and gcc 4.3.3 #5559

williamstein opened this issue Mar 18, 2009 · 4 comments

Comments

@williamstein
Copy link
Contributor

>> x86-Linux-fc (cicero)
>>
>> The following tests failed:
>>
>>        sage -t  "devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/complex_roots.py"
>
> Could you send the output of this test failing?

sage -t  "devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/complex_roots.py"
**********************************************************************
File "/home/mariah/sage/sage-3.4-x86-Linux-fc/devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/c
omplex_roots.py", line 271:
   sage: complex_roots(x^2 + 27*x + 181)
Expected:
   [(-14.61803398874990?..., 1), (-12.3819660112501...? + 0.?e-27*I, 1)]
Got:
   [(-12.3819660112501?, 1), (-14.61803398874990? + 0.?e-27*I, 1)]
**********************************************************************
1 items had failures:

CC: @sagetrac-cwitty

Component: doctest coverage

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/5559

@sagetrac-mabshoff
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-mabshoff mannequin commented Apr 1, 2009

comment:1

This is "only" a problem with gcc 4.3.3.

Cheers,

Michael

@sagetrac-mabshoff sagetrac-mabshoff mannequin changed the title roots issue on fedora core 32-bit roots issue on fedora core 32-bit and gcc 4.3.3 Apr 1, 2009
@sagetrac-mabshoff
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-mabshoff mannequin commented Apr 6, 2009

comment:2

This is a 3.4.1 blocker if there ever was one :)

Cheers,

Michael

@sagetrac-mabshoff sagetrac-mabshoff mannequin modified the milestones: sage-3.4.2, sage-3.4.1 Apr 6, 2009
@sagetrac-mabshoff
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-mabshoff mannequin commented Apr 9, 2009

comment:3

After chatting to cwitty about this problem a couple weeks ago: we can just use another polynomial since the specific choice is irrelevant.

Cheers,

Michael

@sagetrac-mabshoff
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-mabshoff mannequin commented Apr 18, 2009

comment:4

This is a dupe of #5378.

Cheers,

Michael

@sagetrac-mabshoff sagetrac-mabshoff mannequin closed this as completed Apr 18, 2009
@sagetrac-mabshoff sagetrac-mabshoff mannequin removed this from the sage-3.4.1 milestone Apr 18, 2009
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant