We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
It would be nice if this worked rather than returning an error:
sage: F.<t> = LaurentPolynomialRing(GF(2)) sage: t // t --------------------------------------------------------------------------- TypeError Traceback (most recent call last) /home/kedlaya/.sage/temp/kedlaya_laptop/18179/_home_kedlaya__sage_init_sage_0.py in <module>() TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for //: 'sage.rings.polynomial.laurent_polynomial.LaurentPolynomial_mpair' and 'sage.rings.polynomial.laurent_polynomial.LaurentPolynomial_mpair'
As it stands, I don't think univariate Laurent polynomial rings over a field support any division operation that stays within the ring:
sage: (t/t).parent() Fraction Field of Univariate Laurent Polynomial Ring in t over Finite Field of size 2
except maybe if I access the internal representation (as a quotient ring) and implement it by hand.
Component: algebra
Keywords: Laurent polynomial, quotient, division
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/5682
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is done in #11726.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Agreed, thanks!
No branches or pull requests
It would be nice if this worked rather than returning an error:
As it stands, I don't think univariate Laurent polynomial rings over a field support any division operation that stays within the ring:
except maybe if I access the internal representation (as a quotient ring) and implement it by hand.
Component: algebra
Keywords: Laurent polynomial, quotient, division
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/5682
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: