Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

METATICKET Issues preventing 64-bit builds on various flavors of Solaris. #9026

Closed
sagetrac-drkirkby mannequin opened this issue May 24, 2010 · 45 comments
Closed

METATICKET Issues preventing 64-bit builds on various flavors of Solaris. #9026

sagetrac-drkirkby mannequin opened this issue May 24, 2010 · 45 comments

Comments

@sagetrac-drkirkby
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-drkirkby mannequin commented May 24, 2010

The following is list of the issues that are currently preventing Sage build 64-bit on either

  • OpenSolaris (aka Solaris 11) on Intel/AMD x64. (e.g. 'disk')
  • Solaris 10 on Intel/AMD (e.g. 'fulva')
  • Solaris 10 on SPARC (e.g. 't2')

The list can be added as new problems are found, making what William calls a 'metaticket'

Please put

  • "bug" if one knows, or might reasonable expect, it to cause a problem on a particular platform.
  • "OK" if one knows the problem does not exist on that platform, or one reasonably expect it will not be an issue.
  • "unknown" if one can not determine if it will be an issue.

Although OpenSolaris can run on the SPARC platform, very few people run it, so there is little to be gained by tracking issues on that platform. (David Kirkby does not have OpenSolaris installed on any of his SPARC systems)

Trac Title S10 SPARC S10 x64 OpenSolaris x64 Notes
#7861 pynac not building on Open Solaris x64 (32-bit/64-bit mixup) unknown unknown bug
#7864 libfplll tries to link 64-bit objects to 32-bit libstdc++.so unknown unknown bug
#7982 sage_fortran is not working properly on Open Solaris x64 in 64 bit mode. bug bug bug
#8086 numpy fails to build on Open Solaris x64 - 32 / 64-bit mixup unknown unknown bug
#8089 ecl 9.10.2-20091105cvs.p1 fails to build on Open Solaris x64 unknown unknown bug
#9008 Update zlib to latest upstream, and clean up spkg-install bug unknown bug
#9009 Mercurial is not building 64-bit with OpenSolaris with SAGE64=yes. bug bug bug
#9022 python fails to build _socket on OpenSolaris x64, so ipython fails to build. unknown unknown bug
#9023 ghmm needs compiler flag -m64 when SAGE64 is set to "yes" bug bug bug
#9024 tachyon is buiding 32-bit on OpenSolaris x64 even when SAGE64 is set to "yes" bug bug bug
#9025 PALP is building 32-bit on OpenSolaris - probably other platforms too. bug bug bug
#9029 sympow is buiding 32-bit on OpenSolaris x64 even when SAGE64 is set to "yes" bug bug bug
#9030 rubiks is building part 32-bit and part 64-bit on OpenSolaris x64. bug bug bug
#9034 flintqs builds as 32-bit despite SAGE64=yes on OpenSolaris x64 bug bug bug
#9037 pynac fails to build on 64-bit OpenSolaris x64. bug bug bug Pynac 0.2 now in Sage. That must be fixed - see #8903 too
#9040 fatal relocation error installing R on OpenSolaris unknown unknown bug We many need to build R with SunStudio on OpenSolaris or Solaris 10 on x64
#9041 python fails to build _socket on OpenSolaris x64, so pygments fails to build. unknown unknown bug
#9042 Cython fails to build on OpenSolaris x64 unknown unknown bug
#9043 lcalc failing to build on OpenSolaris x64. bug bug bug
#9097 c_lib in Sage library fails to build on OpenSolaris x64 unknown unknown bug
#9098 gap buillds 32-bit on OpenSolaris when SAGE64=yes bug bug bug
#9099 Maxima fails to build on OpenSolaris x64, though ECL does. OK bug bug
#9100 scipy is probably building part 32-bit on OpenSolaris x64 when SAGE64=yes unknown unknown bug This is odd - see trac ticket
#9101 linbox reports "ERROR: BLAS not found!" on Solaris 10 SPARC (64-bit build). bug unknown OK It should use ATLAS, which mis-compiled as 32-bit
#9358 zn_poly passes all tests on on Solaris 10 64-bit SPARC, but fails to install bug bug bug positive review
#9397 Resolve corrupted patches to permit Singular to build on Solaris x86/x64 bug unknown OK Should be fixed by update of Singular at #8059
#9399 Remove Sun-specific junk in rings/finite_rings/stdint.h OK bug bug
#9508 Fix all ATLAS build problems on Solaris/OpenSolaris bug bug bug
#9643 Force ECL to disable assembly code on Solaris 10 x86 as it does on OpenSolaris OK bug OK Positive review (OpenSolaris issue was resolved in #9474)

CC: @dimpase @jaapspies @sagetrac-mvngu @jhpalmieri @robertwb @williamstein

Component: porting: Solaris

Reviewer: Dima Pasechnik

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/9026

@sagetrac-drkirkby sagetrac-drkirkby mannequin added this to the sage-5.11 milestone May 24, 2010
@sagetrac-drkirkby sagetrac-drkirkby mannequin self-assigned this May 24, 2010
@sagetrac-drkirkby

This comment has been minimized.

@sagetrac-drkirkby

This comment has been minimized.

@sagetrac-drkirkby

This comment has been minimized.

@sagetrac-drkirkby

This comment has been minimized.

@sagetrac-drkirkby

This comment has been minimized.

@sagetrac-drkirkby

This comment has been minimized.

@sagetrac-drkirkby

This comment has been minimized.

@sagetrac-drkirkby

This comment has been minimized.

@sagetrac-drkirkby

This comment has been minimized.

@sagetrac-drkirkby

This comment has been minimized.

@sagetrac-drkirkby

This comment has been minimized.

@sagetrac-drkirkby

This comment has been minimized.

@sagetrac-drkirkby

This comment has been minimized.

@sagetrac-drkirkby

This comment has been minimized.

@sagetrac-drkirkby

This comment has been minimized.

@sagetrac-drkirkby

This comment has been minimized.

@sagetrac-drkirkby

This comment has been minimized.

@sagetrac-drkirkby

This comment has been minimized.

@sagetrac-drkirkby

This comment has been minimized.

@sagetrac-drkirkby

This comment has been minimized.

@sagetrac-drkirkby sagetrac-drkirkby mannequin changed the title Issues preventing 64-bit builds on various flavors of Solaris. MATATICKET Issues preventing 64-bit builds on various flavors of Solaris. Jun 28, 2010
@sagetrac-drkirkby

This comment has been minimized.

@sagetrac-drkirkby sagetrac-drkirkby mannequin changed the title MATATICKET Issues preventing 64-bit builds on various flavors of Solaris. METATICKET Issues preventing 64-bit builds on various flavors of Solaris. Jun 28, 2010
@sagetrac-drkirkby

This comment has been minimized.

@jhpalmieri
Copy link
Member

comment:24

As part of this project, we should update the "supported platforms" information, wherever it appears. For example, in the installation guide, it says

Complete compilation of Sage is currently not supported on Solaris

According to the "search_doc" function, the main occurrences of the string "Solaris" are in the file "devel/sage/doc/en/installation/source.rst", so that's the only part of the docs that we need to fix. The file SAGE_ROOT/README.txt says that Solaris on sparc is officially supported, but not Solaris on x86_64. I'm guessing that this is still accurate. There are probably assorted wiki pages about supported platforms, too. In any case, it would be good to maintain a single official list of supported platforms, instead of having conflicting information in different locations.

@jhpalmieri

This comment has been minimized.

@jhpalmieri

This comment has been minimized.

@sagetrac-drkirkby

This comment has been minimized.

@sagetrac-drkirkby

This comment has been minimized.

@sagetrac-drkirkby

This comment has been minimized.

@sagetrac-drkirkby

This comment has been minimized.

@sagetrac-drkirkby

This comment has been minimized.

@jhpalmieri

This comment has been minimized.

@sagetrac-drkirkby

This comment has been minimized.

@jdemeyer jdemeyer modified the milestones: sage-5.11, sage-5.12 Aug 13, 2013
@sagetrac-vbraun-spam sagetrac-vbraun-spam mannequin modified the milestones: sage-6.1, sage-6.2 Jan 30, 2014
@sagetrac-vbraun-spam sagetrac-vbraun-spam mannequin modified the milestones: sage-6.2, sage-6.3 May 6, 2014
@sagetrac-vbraun-spam sagetrac-vbraun-spam mannequin modified the milestones: sage-6.3, sage-6.4 Aug 10, 2014
@mkoeppe
Copy link
Member

mkoeppe commented Apr 1, 2020

comment:46

Should be closed as outdated.

@mkoeppe mkoeppe removed this from the sage-6.4 milestone Apr 1, 2020
@dimpase
Copy link
Member

dimpase commented Apr 1, 2020

Reviewer: Dima Pasechnik

@fchapoton
Copy link
Contributor

comment:48

agreed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants