Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

create a test in the old sage/server directory that shows that one can unpickle an old Sage notebook server directory and load an old-format worksheet #9237

Closed
williamstein opened this issue Jun 14, 2010 · 1 comment

Comments

@williamstein
Copy link
Contributor

Creating this test will justify not doctesting the rest of this directory, and ensure that if somehow the stuff in this directory gets totally broken, then we'll know.

CC: @kcrisman

Component: doctest coverage

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/9237

@williamstein williamstein added this to the sage-5.11 milestone Jun 14, 2010
@williamstein williamstein changed the title create a test in the old sage/server directory that shows that one can unpickle an old Sage notebook server directory create a test in the old sage/server directory that shows that one can unpickle an old Sage notebook server directory and load an old-format worksheet Jun 14, 2010
@jdemeyer jdemeyer modified the milestones: sage-5.11, sage-5.12 Aug 13, 2013
@sagetrac-vbraun-spam sagetrac-vbraun-spam mannequin modified the milestones: sage-6.1, sage-6.2 Jan 30, 2014
@sagetrac-vbraun-spam sagetrac-vbraun-spam mannequin modified the milestones: sage-6.2, sage-6.3 May 6, 2014
@sagetrac-vbraun-spam sagetrac-vbraun-spam mannequin modified the milestones: sage-6.3, sage-6.4 Aug 10, 2014
@kcrisman
Copy link
Member

comment:7

Maybe this isn't necessary any more ...

@kcrisman kcrisman removed this from the sage-6.4 milestone Jun 27, 2018
@mkoeppe mkoeppe closed this as completed Aug 26, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants