Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

some overhaul in organization of database of common graph generators #9373

Closed
sagetrac-mvngu mannequin opened this issue Jun 29, 2010 · 10 comments
Closed

some overhaul in organization of database of common graph generators #9373

sagetrac-mvngu mannequin opened this issue Jun 29, 2010 · 10 comments

Comments

@sagetrac-mvngu
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-mvngu mannequin commented Jun 29, 2010

The database of common graph generators maintains two separate lists of such generators. This entails a lot of work when updating that database as one would need to update two separate lists. Not only that, but having two lists that contain essentially the same information is information duplication. One could update a list and then forgot to update the other list. Better to have one list with links to corresponding generators.

Apply:

Component: graph theory

Author: Minh Van Nguyen

Reviewer: Nathann Cohen

Merged: sage-4.5.2.alpha0

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/9373

@sagetrac-mvngu sagetrac-mvngu mannequin added this to the sage-4.5.2 milestone Jun 29, 2010
@sagetrac-mvngu
Copy link
Mannequin Author

sagetrac-mvngu mannequin commented Jun 29, 2010

Author: Minh Van Nguyen

@sagetrac-mvngu
Copy link
Mannequin Author

sagetrac-mvngu mannequin commented Jun 29, 2010

Attachment: trac_9373-graphdb.patch.gz

@nathanncohen
Copy link
Mannequin

nathanncohen mannequin commented Jul 16, 2010

comment:2

Hello Minh !! I applied this patch on 4.5.rc1, which has a lot of new Graph methods, and found this patch needed to be rebased. I just finished, and your patch is fine for me, thank you for your work ! Here is the rebased version.. Could you give it a final check before setting this to "positive review" ? :-)

Nathann

@sagetrac-mvngu
Copy link
Mannequin Author

sagetrac-mvngu mannequin commented Jul 16, 2010

comment:3

With a rebased patch, some people consider it rather rude to have the rebase author's name in the username field, instead of the original author's name. Your rebased patch clearly has your username. It's like a reviewer replacing the original author's name with their own name, thus claiming credit for authoring the original patch. Perhaps you overlooked this?

@nathanncohen
Copy link
Mannequin

nathanncohen mannequin commented Jul 16, 2010

comment:4

?.....

I'm terribly sorry....

How can I change this field ? Manually ? :-/

Nathann

@nathanncohen
Copy link
Mannequin

nathanncohen mannequin commented Jul 16, 2010

comment:5

Attachment: trac_9373.patch.gz

Ok, I just edited the corresponding line and replaced it with what was written in your patch.

I really hadn't thought of it... I'm very very sorry for that :-/

Nathann

@sagetrac-mvngu
Copy link
Mannequin Author

sagetrac-mvngu mannequin commented Jul 16, 2010

comment:6

Thanks, Nathann. Positive review to your rebased patch.

@sagetrac-mvngu
Copy link
Mannequin Author

sagetrac-mvngu mannequin commented Jul 16, 2010

Reviewer: Nathann Cohen

@sagetrac-mvngu

This comment has been minimized.

@qed777
Copy link
Mannequin

qed777 mannequin commented Jul 21, 2010

Merged: sage-4.5.2.alpha0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant