Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix cvxopt on FreeBSD #9601

Closed
peterjeremy opened this issue Jul 26, 2010 · 18 comments
Closed

Fix cvxopt on FreeBSD #9601

peterjeremy opened this issue Jul 26, 2010 · 18 comments

Comments

@peterjeremy
Copy link

cvxopt requires C99 math functions that are not part of the base FreeBSD libraries. #9543 uses cephes to provide these missing functions but referencing them requires that cvxopt search $SAGE_LOCAL/include. The attached patch modified spkg-install to
include this.

This patch is local to Sage and does not need to be reported upstream.

Component: porting: BSD

Keywords: sd40.5

Reviewer: David Kirkby, Mike Hansen, Peter Jeremy

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/9601

@peterjeremy peterjeremy added this to the sage-5.1 milestone Jul 26, 2010
@peterjeremy peterjeremy self-assigned this Jul 26, 2010
@haraldschilly
Copy link
Member

comment:1

Attachment: cvxopt-0.9.p8.patch.gz

hi, i think this should be coordinated with #6456

@peterjeremy
Copy link
Author

comment:2

An equivalent patch for cvxopt-1.1.2.p1 has been attached to #6456. On the assumption that the newer cvxopt will supplant cvxopt-0.9, this ticket can be closed.

@sagetrac-drkirkby
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-drkirkby mannequin commented Jul 28, 2010

comment:5

Whilst I realise this should be coordinated with #6456, I thought it wise that this got positive review first, to make merging easier.

The fix is clearly FreeBSD specific, so will not impact any other system.

@sagetrac-drkirkby
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-drkirkby mannequin commented Jul 28, 2010

Reviewer: David Kirkby

@sagetrac-drkirkby
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-drkirkby mannequin commented Jul 28, 2010

Author: Peter Jeremy

@qed777
Copy link
Mannequin

qed777 mannequin commented Oct 3, 2010

comment:6

There hasn't been very recent activity at #6456. Does it make sense to put together a new p10 (based on the p9 in 4.6.alpha2), so we can merge this ticket?

@mwhansen
Copy link
Contributor

comment:7

I've just done some more work on #6456.

@qed777
Copy link
Mannequin

qed777 mannequin commented Oct 25, 2010

Work Issues: Add link to updated spkg

@qed777
Copy link
Mannequin

qed777 mannequin commented Oct 25, 2010

comment:8

This ticket is not actionable without an updated spkg or a positive review at #6456, so I'm changing the status to "needs work".

@qed777 qed777 mannequin added s: needs work and removed s: positive review labels Oct 25, 2010
@kcrisman
Copy link
Member

comment:9

Apparently Stephen Montgomery-Smith has had some success with this recently as a "port"

@sagetrac-drkirkby
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-drkirkby mannequin commented Jan 31, 2012

comment:10

Is anyone working on the FreeBSD port now? I'm not aware of Peter working on it. I think he got a bit fed up with what he called the

"release it now, we'll make it work later" mentality.

(They are Peter's words, not mine. See #9601.)

Dave

@sagetrac-drkirkby
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-drkirkby mannequin commented Jan 31, 2012

comment:11

Replying to @sagetrac-drkirkby:

Is anyone working on the FreeBSD port now? I'm not aware of Peter working on it. I think he got a bit fed up with what he called the

"release it now, we'll make it work later" mentality.

(They are Peter's words, not mine. See #9601.)

Dave

Oops, Peter put his comments on #6456, not #9601 which is this ticket!

Dave.

@kcrisman
Copy link
Member

kcrisman commented Feb 1, 2012

comment:12

Is anyone working on the FreeBSD port now? I'm not aware of Peter working on it. I think he got a bit fed up with what he

Well, a friend of one of the WeBWorK developers did manage to make a Sage that passed most tests not too long ago. See the link in comment:9.

@mwhansen
Copy link
Contributor

comment:13

I think this can be closed now since this is in the current cvxopt.

@mwhansen mwhansen removed this from the sage-5.1 milestone May 28, 2012
@mwhansen
Copy link
Contributor

Changed keywords from none to sd40.5

@jdemeyer
Copy link

jdemeyer commented Jun 2, 2012

Changed reviewer from David Kirkby to David Kirkby, Mike Hansen, Peter Jeremy

@jdemeyer
Copy link

jdemeyer commented Jun 2, 2012

Changed work issues from Add link to updated spkg to none

@jdemeyer
Copy link

jdemeyer commented Jun 2, 2012

Changed author from Peter Jeremy to none

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants