New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
n() returns symbolic expression #9913
Comments
comment:1
Even simpler:
|
comment:2
Note also the strange tty output (look in the 2nd argument of
Should I open a separate ticket for that? |
comment:3
I'm changing the component to Regarding the problem with the output Carl mentions in comment:2: This is also present in GiNaC, but the printing is better:
Note the term We should open a new ticket for this and report it on the GiNaC list. I'm not sure if this has anything to do with this ticket ATM. Numeric evaluation seems to work fine in GiNaC:
|
comment:4
Burcin,
I've reported a new ticket (#9947). I let you report it on the GiNaC list. Paul |
Changed keywords from none to pynac |
comment:5
Replying to @zimmermann6:
This issue was fixed upstream by Richard Kreckel. While the fix makes the original example on this ticket work, Jason's example from comment:1 or the one reported by Tian Wei on sage-support (below) still don't work.
|
Attachment: trac_9913-arctan2_evalf.patch.gz |
comment:6
I uploaded a patch to fix this. The problem wasn't in pynac after all, it was the numeric approximation function for |
Changed keywords from pynac to none |
comment:7
positive review, good work Burcin! Paul |
Author: Burcin Erocal |
Reviewer: Paul Zimmermann |
Merged: sage-4.6.1.alpha0 |
from sage-support:
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/browse_thread/thread/b36c90f1490eac19#
CC: @sagetrac-cwitty
Component: symbolics
Author: Burcin Erocal
Reviewer: Paul Zimmermann
Merged: sage-4.6.1.alpha0
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/9913
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: