Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider using PyPy portable binaries #88

Open
Tracked by #92
saghul opened this issue Sep 2, 2015 · 2 comments
Open
Tracked by #92

Consider using PyPy portable binaries #88

saghul opened this issue Sep 2, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@saghul
Copy link
Owner

saghul commented Sep 2, 2015

This ones: https://bitbucket.org/squeaky/portable-pypy/downloads

Reference: https://github.com/squeaky-pl/portable-pypy
@ludovic-gasc
Copy link
Contributor

If it's possible, I would prefer to have the choice to compile or use portable binary when I install via pythonz.

@saghul
Copy link
Owner Author

saghul commented Sep 3, 2015

Compiling is not an option, because it takes a long long time, but the portable binaries should do.

@berdario berdario mentioned this issue Sep 17, 2015
Open
6 tasks
saghul referenced this issue Jan 27, 2016
@saghul
Add support for PyPy 4.0.1
8370f0c
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@ludovic-gasc @saghul