Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs(contribute): update CONTRIBUTING.md link #20

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jan 24, 2018

Conversation

yungcheng
Copy link
Contributor

PR Checklist

What kind of change does this PR introduce? (add 'x' - [x])

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other... Please describe:

Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (check one)

  • Yes
  • No

If yes, please describe the impact and migration path for existing applications:
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

The PR fulfills these requirements:

  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)

  • Both unit and integration tests pass

  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

  • The PR title follows conventional commit format:
    commit-type(optional scope): commit description.

    Supported commit types: build, chore, ci, docs, feat, fix, perf, refactor, revert, style, test.
    Supported scope: The scope should be the name of the npm package affected (engine, compiler, wire-service, etc.)
    
  • More details on LWC semantic commit can be found here.

Other information:

@yungcheng yungcheng requested a review from apapko January 22, 2018 05:56
@salesforce-best-lwc-internal
Copy link

Benchmark comparison

Base commit: ddc6a61 | Target commit: d7b5337

benchmark base(ddc6a61) target(d7b5337) trend
append-1k.benchmark:benchmark-table/add/1k 324.18 (± 16.93 ms) 424.07 (± 16.93 ms) 👎
clear-1k.benchmark:benchmark-table/clear/1k 48.49 (± 6.35 ms) 63.19 (± 6.35 ms) 👎
create-1k.benchmark:benchmark-table/create/1k 191.84 (± 13.56 ms) 248.15 (± 13.56 ms) 👎
update-10th-1k.benchmark:benchmark-table/update-10th/1k 185.32 (± 8.11 ms) 238.96 (± 8.11 ms) 👎

Copy link
Member

@pmdartus pmdartus left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@trevor-bliss trevor-bliss left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should probably make a pass and update all links. I see a few in the README and other docs in the repo.

@yungcheng yungcheng mentioned this pull request Jan 22, 2018
@salesforce-best-lwc-internal
Copy link

Benchmark comparison

Base commit: 5339d5b | Target commit: a11464f

benchmark base(5339d5b) target(a11464f) trend
append-1k.benchmark:benchmark-table/add/1k 334.54 (± 16.70 ms) 425.75 (± 16.70 ms) 👎
clear-1k.benchmark:benchmark-table/clear/1k 48.95 (± 7.05 ms) 63.05 (± 7.05 ms) 👎
create-1k.benchmark:benchmark-table/create/1k 194.13 (± 15.66 ms) 239.85 (± 15.66 ms) 👎
update-10th-1k.benchmark:benchmark-table/update-10th/1k 189.63 (± 17.43 ms) 227.70 (± 17.43 ms) 👎

@yungcheng
Copy link
Contributor Author

I like how updating docs and links make benchmark worse 💩
@pmdartus could you give me some insights on why this happened?

README.md Outdated

This repository contains the source code for the Raptor Engine. Additionaly, it contains examples, documentation, meeting notes and discussion notes for developers [contributing](https://git.soma.salesforce.com/raptor/raptor/tree/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) or using Raptor.
This repository contains the source code for the LWC Engine and Compiler. Additionaly, it contains examples, documentation, meeting notes and discussion notes for developers [contributing](https://github.com/salesforce/lwc/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) or using Raptor.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

README.md Outdated
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ This project is been developed by the Raptor Team in collaboration with Aura Tea

## Contributing

Read our [contributing documentation](https://git.soma.salesforce.com/raptor/raptor/tree/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) to set up your environment and start contributing.
Read our [contributing documentation](https://github.com/salesforce/lwc/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) to set up your environment and start contributing.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CONTRIBUTING.md Outdated
```

### 2) Setup npm/yarn to use Nexus repositories

Nexus provides a public caching proxy and a private repository which hosts several dependent raptor modules. Follow the instructions at [https://sfdc.co/npm-nexus](https://sfdc.co/npm-nexus) to setup access to the Nexus npm registry.
Nexus provides a public caching proxy and a private repository which hosts several dependent lwc modules. Follow the instructions at [https://sfdc.co/npm-nexus](https://sfdc.co/npm-nexus) to setup access to the Nexus npm registry.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We don't need Nexus anymore since the packages are published on an open registry.

@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
Supported scope: The scope should be the name of the npm package affected (engine, compiler, wire-service, etc.)


- More details on LWC semantic commit can be found [here](https://git.soma.salesforce.com/lwc/lwc/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#commit).
- More details on LWC semantic commit can be found [here](https://github.com/salesforce/lwc/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#commit).
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ describe('ECMA Object', function () {
// We do not patch Object.getOwnPropertySymbols because
// it is patched by the Symbol polyfill later on
// in the code. As a result, this test will not work in node.
// See https://git.soma.salesforce.com/raptor/raptor/issues/833
// See lwc(internal) #833
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As discussed in #22 (comment), the internal repo will maybe be deleted one day. It would be nice to delete all the links to the internal repo.

@salesforce-best-lwc-internal
Copy link

Benchmark comparison

Base commit: b5fc0ed | Target commit: d246311

benchmark base(b5fc0ed) target(d246311) trend
append-1k.benchmark:benchmark-table/add/1k 328.81 (± 9.57 ms) 350.55 (± 9.57 ms) 👎
clear-1k.benchmark:benchmark-table/clear/1k 48.70 (± 1.31 ms) 55.60 (± 1.31 ms) 👎
create-1k.benchmark:benchmark-table/create/1k 195.45 (± 3.93 ms) 201.92 (± 3.93 ms) 👎
update-10th-1k.benchmark:benchmark-table/update-10th/1k 183.68 (± 2.50 ms) 191.38 (± 2.50 ms) 👎

@salesforce-best-lwc-internal
Copy link

Benchmark comparison

Base commit: b5fc0ed | Target commit: 4a44111

benchmark base(b5fc0ed) target(4a44111) trend
append-1k.benchmark:benchmark-table/add/1k 328.81 (± 5.78 ms) 336.77 (± 5.78 ms) 👎
clear-1k.benchmark:benchmark-table/clear/1k 48.70 (± 1.25 ms) 49.16 (± 1.25 ms) 👌
create-1k.benchmark:benchmark-table/create/1k 195.45 (± 2.23 ms) 196.38 (± 2.23 ms) 👌
update-10th-1k.benchmark:benchmark-table/update-10th/1k 183.68 (± 2.30 ms) 186.40 (± 2.30 ms) 👌

@yungcheng yungcheng merged commit b105380 into master Jan 24, 2018
@yungcheng yungcheng deleted the vince/fix-pr-template-link branch January 24, 2018 22:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants