Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: switch from circle ci to github actions #3783

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Oct 23, 2023
Merged

chore: switch from circle ci to github actions #3783

merged 15 commits into from
Oct 23, 2023

Conversation

nolanlawson
Copy link
Contributor

Details

Does what it says on the tin

Does this pull request introduce a breaking change?

  • ✅ No, it does not introduce a breaking change.

Does this pull request introduce an observable change?

  • ✅ No, it does not introduce an observable change.

@nolanlawson
Copy link
Contributor Author

/nucleus test

@nolanlawson nolanlawson marked this pull request as ready for review October 9, 2023 22:14
@nolanlawson nolanlawson requested a review from a team as a code owner October 9, 2023 22:14
Copy link
Member

@jmsjtu jmsjtu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚀

@nolanlawson
Copy link
Contributor Author

Let's hold off until after EF – no reason to rush this

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Instead of having a custom script to retry, what about using a GH action retry step?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I saw this, but I felt uncomfortable since it's not an officially supported Action.

Comment on lines +35 to +36
- name: Install dependencies
run: yarn install --frozen-lockfile
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It takes ~1 min to build to build the repo. Is it worth reusing the NX cache between runs?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have run into numerous issues with NX caching recently (something about stale/invalid artifacts), so we actually disabled it in Nucleus runs.

I'm happy to re-enable it at some point, but saving ~60s is not super important to me right now.

@nolanlawson nolanlawson merged commit f3252fb into master Oct 23, 2023
7 checks passed
@nolanlawson nolanlawson deleted the nolan/gha branch October 23, 2023 21:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants