v7.0.0
LWC v7.0.0 contains breaking changes. Please read carefully below if you are upgrading from v6.
If you are upgrading from v5, please upgrade to v6 first.
Note
LWC v7 corresponds to Salesforce release Winter '25 (API version 62).
New features
- Class object binding for more ergonomic
classes in templates this.stylefor a more ergonomic way to change component styles at runtimethis.hostElementfor an alternative tothis.template.hostthat works in light DOM
Summary of breaking changes
- Class object binding
- New
this.styleproperty - New
this.hostElementproperty - Improved TypeScript types
@lwc/template-compilerAPI changes
Breaking changes
Class object binding
Note
On the Salesforce Lightning platform, this change only applies to components with an API version of 62 or above.
Class object binding is a new feature that makes it more ergonomic to render class attributes in your LWC components. As part of this feature, class rendering has changed for some uncommon use cases.
If you are using a dynamic class in your template:
<template>
<div class={myClass}></div>
</template>Then the rendering of this class may change if you were previously defining myClass as something other than a string, null, or undefined.
For example, consider if myClass is a boolean:
export default class extends LightningElement {
myClass = false
}Old behavior:
This renders:
<div class="false"></div>New behavior:
<div class=""></div>This change applies to booleans, numbers, functions, arrays, and objects. Below is a table summarizing the change:
| Type | Example | Rendered (old) | Rendered (new) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Boolean | true |
class="true" |
class="" |
| Number | 1 |
class="1" |
class="" |
| Function | () => {} |
class="() => {}" |
class="" |
| Array | ["a", "b"] |
class="a,b" |
class="a b" |
| Object | { a: true } |
class="[object Object]" |
class="a" |
In short:
- Booleans, numbers, and functions are no longer directly stringified, but are stripped instead.
- Arrays and objects are no longer stringified, but instead follow class object binding semantics.
This may break a component if it is using a CSS selector like these:
.false {}
.true {}
[class="1"] {}Or if it is using querySelector or other traversal techniques that rely on the class name:
this.template.querySelector('.false')
this.template.querySelector('.true')
this.template.querySelector('[class="1"]')In rare cases, this can also cause breakages across component boundaries. For example, if you have a global stylesheet relying on light DOM or synthetic shadow DOM, and thus the ability to pierce inside of components you don't own, then the above CSS selectors would break in that case as well.
To resolve any breakages:
- Avoid anti-patterns for styling components.
- In cases where you want to render a value as a string (e.g.
class="false"orclass="1"), convert it to a string usingString(value).
This change may also require updating snapshots, e.g. in Jest tests.
New this.style property
Note
On the Salesforce Lightning platform, this change only applies to components with an API version of 62 or above.
Components can now access their CSSStyleDeclaration using this.style:
renderedCallback() {
this.style.color = 'red'
}This is a breaking change if the component uses this.style as an expando:
renderedCallback() {
if (!this.style) {
this.style = "foo"
}
}In the above case, the component author may assume that this.style is initially undefined, and then set it to a new value ("foo"). After this change, the above code will not work as expected, because this.style is initially truthy rather than undefined.
To resolve this, set a class property on the component, initialized to undefined, rather than using an expando:
+ style = undefined
renderedCallback() {
if (!this.style) {
this.style = "foo"
}
}You may also rename your this.style expando to something else (e.g. this.customStyle).
New this.hostElement property
Note
On the Salesforce Lightning platform, this change only applies to components with an API version of 62 or above.
Components can now access this.hostElement as a convenient alternative to this.template.host:
renderedCallback() {
console.log(this.template.host) // <x-component>
console.log(this.hostElement) // <x-component>
}Additionally, this works in light DOM components to access the "host" element (similar to the :host CSS pseudo-class in light DOM scoped styles). This provides an ergonomic way to access the root HTMLElement object in either light DOM or shadow DOM components.
Similar to the new this.style property, this is a breaking change if you are using this.hostElement already as an expando. Refer to the this.style release notes for a resolution.
Improved TypeScript types
Note
This change only applies to component authors using TypeScript, which is not yet fully supported.
The TypeScript definitions for the lwc package are greatly improved, to more closely match the ground truth of the actual APIs for LightningElement, createElement, etc. at runtime. You may need to adjust your TypeScript code or version to adapt to the new typings.
Summary
- The minimum supported version of TypeScript is v5.4.5.
- The only supported compiler target is
"ESNext". ContextValuehas been renamed toWireContextValue.ContextConsumerhas been renamed toWireContextConsumer.Contextualizerhas been renamed toWireContextProvider.StylesheetFactoryhas been renamed toStylesheet.StylesheetFactorieshas been renamed toStylesheets.StringKeyedRecordhas been removed. Instead, use the typeRecord<string, any>.ShadowSupportModehas been removed. Instead, use the string values"any","reset", or"native".WireAdapteris now a generic type with a default type parameter.WireAdapterConstructoris now a generic type with a default type parameter.- All decorators can now be used with the new decorator implementation introduced in TypeScript v5 as well as the old, experimental implementation.
this.templateis now possibly null, reflecting the state for components using light DOM.this.template.hostin aLightningElementis now typed asHTMLElement, rather than the broaderElement.- The return type of
createElementhas been updated to reflect the fact that the element created contains the@api-decorated props from the component definition.- A new helper type,
LightningHTMLElement, has been introduced to provide an easy way of accessing the return type.const cmp: LightningHTMLElement<MyComponent> = createElement('my-component', { is: MyComponent });
- WARNING: Due to limitations of TypeScript, this new type incorrectly contains all props defined on the component, not just decorated props. Only decorated props are accessible at runtime.
- A new helper type,
- Importing from
"lwc"now provides module definitions for HTML/CSS imports. The module definitions are also available by directly importing a new package,@lwc/types.
Common breakages and fixes
| Breakage | Fix |
|---|---|
HTML imports (import myComponent from './my-component.html') |
Import @lwc/types or lwc/types somewhere in your project. I.e.: import '@lwc/types'. |
StringKeyedRecord |
Replace with Record<string, any> or similar. |
ContextValue |
Renamed to WireContextValue, but it's really just Record<string, any>, so you could use a more precise type instead. |
ContextConsumer |
Renamed to WireContextConsumer |
Contextualizer |
Renamed to WireContextProvider |
createElement |
Use type assertion to cast to HTMLElement & MyComponentApiDecoratedProps. You have to define your own interface to get the @api decorated props, because TypeScript can't detect that. (You can use your component class, but that includes all component and LightningElement props, not just component @api decorated props, so it's not ideal.) |
this.template is possibly undefined |
Use optional chaining (?.) or non-null assertion (!.) |
Cannot find name ClassMemberDecoratorContext (or other decorator type) |
Use TypeScript v5.4.5 |
| Other type errors? | Use TypeScript v5.4.5 |
@lwc/template-compiler API changes
Note
This change only affects direct consumers of the @lwc/template-compiler npm package, who are using the compile API.
Due to a refactoring of the @lwc/compiler and @lwc/template-compiler packages, the @lwc/template-compiler compile function now requires the component's file name (i.e. the namespace and name options) when compiling the template.
To resolve the breaking change, add the new options. For example:
import { compile } from '@lwc/template-compiler'
compile({
...previousOptions,
// Assuming the component is `<x-foo>`:
namespace: 'x',
name: 'foo',
})What's Changed
- refactor: version mismatch warning on patch version difference by @SourabhMulay in #4216
- feat(lightning-element): expose hostElement property by @rochejul in #4259
- chore(git): run CI checks on push @W-15999315@ by @wjhsf in #4293
- build(deps): bump the theoretically-non-breaking group across 1 directory with 30 updates by @dependabot in #4306
- fix: put
this.hostElementbehind API version 62 by @nolanlawson in #4308 - feat: allow access to host CSSStyleDeclaration via this.style by @nolanlawson in #4044
- feat: Template class object binding by @pmdartus in #3950
- refactor(template-compiler): move implicit stylesheet import and style token to template compiler by @jmsjtu in #4147
- feat(types): update types for v7 by @wjhsf in #4186
- chore: release v7.0.0 by @nolanlawson in #4309
- chore: release v7.0.0 by @nolanlawson in #4310
New Contributors
Full Changelog: v6.7.2...v7.0.0