Understanding Jinja topic, Jinja doc issues. #33995
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Removes the "Full list of builtin ..." from each module reference list, leaving just the module type for scanability. Refs saltstack#12470 Refs saltstack#10206 Refs saltstack#10480 Refs saltstack#23522 Refs saltstack#33023
|
@jacobhammons good job!! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
-Adds new Understanding Jinja topic, and fixes several Jinja doc issues.
-Removes the "Full list of builtin ..." from each module reference list, leaving just the module type for scanability.
Refs #12470
Refs #10206
Refs #10480
Refs #23522
Refs #33023