asciidoc xmllint xsltproc #289
Milestone
Comments
|
The man page and the html document is shipped together with the asciidoc template, so there should be no need to run asciidoc. That was the idea, anyway. This should work: |
mcshane
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 17, 2015
doc/bcftools.1 exists and is updated by the maintainers from the bcftools.txt asciidoc, so there is no need to build this file for installation Fixes #289
mcshane
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 28, 2015
doc/bcftools.1 exists and is updated by the maintainers from the bcftools.txt asciidoc, so there is no need to build this file for installation add some documentation to the Makefile to explain docs dependency on asciidoc Fixes #289
pd3
pushed a commit
to pd3/bcftools
that referenced
this issue
Jul 29, 2015
doc/bcftools.1 exists and is updated by the maintainers from the bcftools.txt asciidoc, so there is no need to build this file for installation add some documentation to the Makefile to explain docs dependency on asciidoc Fixes samtools#289
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hi Guys,
I have just noticed that there is an install dependency on asciidoc, xmllint and xsltproc which dont appear to be standard libraries (on Ubuntu at least) and which need installing separately. This adds complication for users that dont have root access. Additionally the the make tests pass without indicating these libraries are required for the install.
Was this intentional? I have to admit this is the first package that has failed to install due to missing documentation dependences so this maybe more normal than I think.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: