Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DPL-1082 - Research use of poolings/new for 'blending pools' (BGE) #4013

Open
3 tasks
BenTopping opened this issue Feb 1, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
3 tasks
Labels
BGE Research Research only Size: S Small - low effort & risk Value: 4 Value to the insitute is high

Comments

@BenTopping
Copy link
Contributor

BenTopping commented Feb 1, 2024

Description
Tag clashes prevent the blending of the final two BGE pools via the Sequencescape poolings/new page. We want to identify if it is possible to allow BGE pools to be blended by adapting poolings/new to treat BGE differently. We want to be careful removing any existing poolings/new constraints because other pipelines and processes rely on these constraints. Ideally we would identify the pools as BGE, like library_type, and allow them to be blended or use some other flag like tag_depth to allow them to be blended.

  • Identify if poolings/new can be adapted to support this 'blending' or if there are any existing workarounds for poolings/new that would allow us to bypass the tag clash constraint.
  • If poolings/new is not possible we need to document what the issues are so that we can consider them before building blending functionality into Limber.
  • Create another story if the solution is appropriate or communicate with stakeholders that this option isn’t possible and document why.

Background on BGE available at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pp4p2n3wMuDTlwDV6rr6u9hZD0F2-F4FN3PPRauTJ-g/edit?usp=sharing

Who the primary contacts are for this work
Ben T, Katy T, Matt M, Liz C

Knowledge or Stake holders
Matt M, Liz C

@BenTopping BenTopping added Research Research only Size: S Small - low effort & risk Value: 4 Value to the insitute is high BGE labels Feb 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
BGE Research Research only Size: S Small - low effort & risk Value: 4 Value to the insitute is high
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant