We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hi @sanghoon I notice that for short-cut connections, A PowerLayer is used for identity mapping(since both power and scale are set to 1) as follows:
layer { name: "conv2_3/input" type: "Power" bottom: "conv2_2" top: "conv2_3/input" power_param { power: 1 scale: 1 shift: 0 } } layer { name: "conv2_3" type: "Eltwise" bottom: "conv2_3/3" bottom: "conv2_3/input" top: "conv2_3" eltwise_param { operation: SUM coeff: 1 coeff: 1 } }
I'm wondering if "conv2_3/input" is neccessary. Why not take "conv2_2" directly as bottom input for "conv2_3"?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
i think you can.
Sorry, something went wrong.
You can exclude the redundant Power layers. I've added them so that I can easily generate the prototxt with my own script, but they do nothing.
@sanghoon can you share your script which to generate the prototxt? thanks.
No branches or pull requests
Hi @sanghoon
I notice that for short-cut connections, A PowerLayer is used for identity mapping(since both power and scale are set to 1) as follows:
layer {
name: "conv2_3/input"
type: "Power"
bottom: "conv2_2"
top: "conv2_3/input"
power_param {
power: 1
scale: 1
shift: 0
}
}
layer {
name: "conv2_3"
type: "Eltwise"
bottom: "conv2_3/3"
bottom: "conv2_3/input"
top: "conv2_3"
eltwise_param {
operation: SUM
coeff: 1
coeff: 1
}
}
I'm wondering if "conv2_3/input" is neccessary. Why not take "conv2_2" directly as bottom input for "conv2_3"?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: