Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "Move coverage script to Makefile" #505

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

nschonni
Copy link
Contributor

@nschonni nschonni commented Nov 1, 2014

Reverts #503
For platform incompatibility reasons discussed in the PR

@kevva
Copy link
Member

kevva commented Nov 1, 2014

Single quotes.

@kevva
Copy link
Member

kevva commented Nov 1, 2014

Also, don't revert the .gitignore.


echo("Piping mocha to coveralls");

env["NODESASS_COVERAGE"] = 1;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

env['NODESASS_COV'] = 1;

@nschonni
Copy link
Contributor Author

nschonni commented Nov 1, 2014

When/why did NODESASS_COVERAGE and lib-cov get renamed?

@kevva
Copy link
Member

kevva commented Nov 1, 2014

Why? Because it's shorter. And lib-cov is the common standard used.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same when pulling f4d9919 on revert-503-coverage into 8ac7c03 on master.

@nschonni
Copy link
Contributor Author

nschonni commented Nov 1, 2014

@kevva I reapplyed the naming. The .gitignore can be cleaned up in a separate PR using on of the GitHub kitchen sink versions.
The single quoting isn't present in the prepublish script either, so they can both be updated in a separate PR.

@kevva
Copy link
Member

kevva commented Nov 4, 2014

Closing this in favor of #508.

@kevva kevva closed this Nov 4, 2014
@andrew andrew deleted the revert-503-coverage branch December 13, 2014 17:28
jiongle1 pushed a commit to scantist-ossops-m2/node-sass that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2024
Straightens out some sass_interface api issues
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants