GT++: Selenium YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!

[satoshinm]

Like #8 but instead of in Factorization in GT++:

[20:21:40] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Boiling Point: -4C.
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockSelenium has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:62)...
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name frameGtSelenium has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox.<init>(ItemBlockGtFrameBox.java:17)
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:62)...
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************

and later:

[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockBromine has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:62)...
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************

and many more:

[20:21:40] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockZirconium has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:62)...
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name frameGtZirconium has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox.<init>(ItemBlockGtFrameBox.java:17)
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:62)...
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:40] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:40] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer length: 0
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockRuthenium has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:62)...
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name frameGtRuthenium has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox.<init>(ItemBlockGtFrameBox.java:17)
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:62)...
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:40] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:40] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer length: 0
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockIodine has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:62)...
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name frameGtIodine has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox.<init>(ItemBlockGtFrameBox.java:17)
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:62)...
[20:21:40] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:40] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:40] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer length: 0
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockHafnium has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:62)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name frameGtHafnium has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox.<init>(ItemBlockGtFrameBox.java:17)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:62)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer length: 0
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockDysprosium has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:62)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name frameGtDysprosium has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox.<init>(ItemBlockGtFrameBox.java:17)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:62)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer length: 0
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockTellurium has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:62)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name frameGtTellurium has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox.<init>(ItemBlockGtFrameBox.java:17)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:62)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer length: 0
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockRhodium has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:62)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name frameGtRhodium has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox.<init>(ItemBlockGtFrameBox.java:17)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:62)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer length: 0
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockRhenium has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:62)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name frameGtRhenium has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox.<init>(ItemBlockGtFrameBox.java:17)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:62)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer length: 0
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockThallium has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:62)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name frameGtThallium has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox.<init>(ItemBlockGtFrameBox.java:17)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:62)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer length: 0
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockTechnetium has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:62)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearTechnetium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickTechnetium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickTechnetium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongTechnetium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickTechnetium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickTechnetium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickTechnetium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongTechnetium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearTechnetium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickTechnetium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtTechnetium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringTechnetium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: rotorTechnetium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickTechnetium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringTechnetium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtTechnetium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockPolonium has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:62)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearPolonium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickPolonium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickPolonium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongPolonium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickPolonium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickPolonium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickPolonium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongPolonium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearPolonium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickPolonium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtPolonium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringPolonium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: rotorPolonium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickPolonium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringPolonium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtPolonium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockAstatine has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:62)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearAstatine was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickAstatine was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickAstatine was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongAstatine was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickAstatine was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickAstatine was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickAstatine was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongAstatine was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearAstatine was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickAstatine was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtAstatine was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringAstatine was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: rotorAstatine was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickAstatine was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringAstatine was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtAstatine was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockRadon has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:62)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearRadon was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringRadon was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickRadon was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltRadon was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickRadon was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringRadon was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickRadon was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtRadon was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickRadon was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltRadon was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickRadon was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongRadon was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickRadon was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickRadon was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickRadon was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongRadon was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: screwRadon was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringRadon was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: rotorRadon was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickRadon was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickRadon was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickRadon was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickRadon was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearRadon was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltRadon was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltRadon was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: screwRadon was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearRadon was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickRadon was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtRadon was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringRadon was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: rotorRadon was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickRadon was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringRadon was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtRadon was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockFrancium has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:62)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearFrancium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickFrancium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickFrancium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongFrancium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickFrancium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickFrancium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickFrancium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongFrancium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearFrancium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickFrancium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtFrancium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringFrancium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: rotorFrancium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickFrancium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringFrancium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtFrancium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockRadium has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearRadium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickRadium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickRadium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongRadium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickRadium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickRadium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickRadium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongRadium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearRadium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickRadium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtRadium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringRadium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: rotorRadium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickRadium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringRadium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtRadium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockActinium has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearActinium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickActinium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickActinium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongActinium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickActinium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickActinium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickActinium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongActinium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearActinium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickActinium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtActinium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringActinium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: rotorActinium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickActinium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringActinium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtActinium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockProtactinium has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearProtactinium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickProtactinium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickProtactinium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongProtactinium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickProtactinium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickProtactinium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickProtactinium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongProtactinium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearProtactinium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickProtactinium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtProtactinium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringProtactinium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: rotorProtactinium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickProtactinium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringProtactinium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtProtactinium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockNeptunium has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearNeptunium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickNeptunium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickNeptunium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongNeptunium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickNeptunium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickNeptunium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickNeptunium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongNeptunium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearNeptunium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickNeptunium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtNeptunium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringNeptunium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: rotorNeptunium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickNeptunium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringNeptunium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtNeptunium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockCurium has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearCurium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickCurium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickCurium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongCurium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickCurium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickCurium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickCurium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongCurium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearCurium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickCurium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtCurium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringCurium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: rotorCurium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickCurium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringCurium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtCurium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockBerkelium has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearBerkelium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickBerkelium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickBerkelium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongBerkelium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickBerkelium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickBerkelium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickBerkelium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongBerkelium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearBerkelium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickBerkelium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtBerkelium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringBerkelium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: rotorBerkelium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickBerkelium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringBerkelium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtBerkelium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockCalifornium has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearCalifornium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickCalifornium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickCalifornium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongCalifornium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickCalifornium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickCalifornium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickCalifornium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongCalifornium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearCalifornium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickCalifornium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtCalifornium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringCalifornium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: rotorCalifornium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickCalifornium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringCalifornium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtCalifornium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockEinsteinium has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearEinsteinium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickEinsteinium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickEinsteinium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongEinsteinium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickEinsteinium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickEinsteinium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickEinsteinium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongEinsteinium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearEinsteinium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickEinsteinium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtEinsteinium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringEinsteinium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: rotorEinsteinium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickEinsteinium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringEinsteinium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtEinsteinium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockFermium has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearFermium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickFermium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickFermium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongFermium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickFermium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickFermium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickFermium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongFermium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearFermium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickFermium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtFermium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringFermium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: rotorFermium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickFermium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringFermium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtFermium was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockLithium7 has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearLithium7 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLithium7 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtLithium7 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringLithium7 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: rotorLithium7 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLithium7 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringLithium7 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtLithium7 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer length: 0
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearLithium7 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringLithium7 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLithium7 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltLithium7 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearLithium7 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLithium7 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringLithium7 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLithium7 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtLithium7 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLithium7 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltLithium7 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLithium7 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongLithium7 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLithium7 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLithium7 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLithium7 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongLithium7 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: screwLithium7 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringLithium7 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: rotorLithium7 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLithium7 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLithium7 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLithium7 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLithium7 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearLithium7 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltLithium7 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltLithium7 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: screwLithium7 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockThorium232 has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearThorium232 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickThorium232 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickThorium232 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongThorium232 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickThorium232 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickThorium232 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickThorium232 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongThorium232 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearThorium232 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickThorium232 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtThorium232 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringThorium232 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: rotorThorium232 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickThorium232 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringThorium232 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtThorium232 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockUranium232 has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltUranium232 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearUranium232 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtUranium232 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringUranium232 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: rotorUranium232 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringUranium232 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtUranium232 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer length: 0
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearUranium232 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: plateDoubleUranium232 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearUranium232 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: plateDoubleUranium232 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: plateDoubleUranium232 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: plateDoubleUranium232 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockUranium233 has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltUranium233 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearUranium233 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtUranium233 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringUranium233 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: rotorUranium233 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringUranium233 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtUranium233 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer length: 0
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearUranium233 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: plateDoubleUranium233 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearUranium233 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: plateDoubleUranium233 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: plateDoubleUranium233 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: plateDoubleUranium233 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockPlutonium238 has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearPlutonium238 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickPlutonium238 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickPlutonium238 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongPlutonium238 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickPlutonium238 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickPlutonium238 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickPlutonium238 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongPlutonium238 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearPlutonium238 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickPlutonium238 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtPlutonium238 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringPlutonium238 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: rotorPlutonium238 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickPlutonium238 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringPlutonium238 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtPlutonium238 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockSiliconCarbide has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name frameGtSiliconCarbide has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox.<init>(ItemBlockGtFrameBox.java:17)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:62)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: dustOxygen was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: dustOxygen was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer length: 3
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer is stacksizeVar null? true
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: dustOxygen was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Dust Mixer Recipe: Silicon Carbide - Success
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockZirconiumCarbide has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name frameGtZirconiumCarbide has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox.<init>(ItemBlockGtFrameBox.java:17)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:62)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: dustOxygen was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: dustOxygen was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer length: 3
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer is stacksizeVar null? true
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: dustOxygen was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Dust Mixer Recipe: Zirconium Carbide - Success
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockTantalumCarbide has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name frameGtTantalumCarbide has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox.<init>(ItemBlockGtFrameBox.java:17)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:62)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: dustOxygen was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: dustOxygen was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer length: 3
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer is stacksizeVar null? true
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: dustOxygen was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Dust Mixer Recipe: Tantalum Carbide - Success
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockNiobiumCarbide has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name frameGtNiobiumCarbide has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox.<init>(ItemBlockGtFrameBox.java:17)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:62)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: dustOxygen was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: dustOxygen was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer length: 3
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer is stacksizeVar null? true
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: dustOxygen was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Dust Mixer Recipe: Niobium Carbide - Success
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockFluorite has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearFluorite was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringFluorite was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickFluorite was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltFluorite was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickFluorite was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringFluorite was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickFluorite was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtFluorite was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickFluorite was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltFluorite was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickFluorite was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongFluorite was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickFluorite was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickFluorite was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickFluorite was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongFluorite was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: screwFluorite was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringFluorite was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: rotorFluorite was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickFluorite was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickFluorite was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickFluorite was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickFluorite was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearFluorite was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltFluorite was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltFluorite was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: screwFluorite was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearFluorite was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickFluorite was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtFluorite was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringFluorite was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: rotorFluorite was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickFluorite was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringFluorite was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: dustFluorine was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtFluorite was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockBerylliumTetrafluoride has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearBerylliumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringBerylliumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickBerylliumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltBerylliumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickBerylliumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringBerylliumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickBerylliumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtBerylliumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickBerylliumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltBerylliumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickBerylliumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongBerylliumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickBerylliumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickBerylliumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickBerylliumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongBerylliumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: screwBerylliumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringBerylliumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: rotorBerylliumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickBerylliumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickBerylliumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickBerylliumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickBerylliumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearBerylliumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltBerylliumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltBerylliumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: screwBerylliumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearBerylliumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickBerylliumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtBerylliumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringBerylliumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: rotorBerylliumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickBerylliumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringBerylliumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: dustFluorine was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtBerylliumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockLithiumTetrafluoride has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearLithiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringLithiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLithiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltLithiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLithiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringLithiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLithiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtLithiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLithiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltLithiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLithiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongLithiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLithiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLithiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLithiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongLithiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: screwLithiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringLithiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: rotorLithiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLithiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLithiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLithiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLithiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearLithiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltLithiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltLithiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: screwLithiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearLithiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLithiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtLithiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringLithiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: rotorLithiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLithiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringLithiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: dustFluorine was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtLithiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockThoriumTetrafluoride has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearThoriumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringThoriumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickThoriumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltThoriumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickThoriumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringThoriumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickThoriumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtThoriumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickThoriumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltThoriumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickThoriumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongThoriumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickThoriumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickThoriumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickThoriumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongThoriumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: screwThoriumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringThoriumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: rotorThoriumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickThoriumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickThoriumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickThoriumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickThoriumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearThoriumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltThoriumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltThoriumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: screwThoriumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearThoriumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickThoriumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtThoriumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringThoriumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: rotorThoriumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickThoriumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringThoriumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: dustFluorine was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtThoriumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockThoriumHexafluoride has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearThoriumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringThoriumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickThoriumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltThoriumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickThoriumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringThoriumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickThoriumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtThoriumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickThoriumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltThoriumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickThoriumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongThoriumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickThoriumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickThoriumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickThoriumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongThoriumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: screwThoriumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringThoriumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: rotorThoriumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickThoriumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickThoriumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickThoriumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickThoriumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearThoriumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltThoriumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltThoriumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: screwThoriumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearThoriumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickThoriumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtThoriumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringThoriumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: rotorThoriumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickThoriumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringThoriumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: dustFluorine was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtThoriumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockUraniumTetrafluoride has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearUraniumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringUraniumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickUraniumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltUraniumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickUraniumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringUraniumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickUraniumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtUraniumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickUraniumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltUraniumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickUraniumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongUraniumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickUraniumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickUraniumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickUraniumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongUraniumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: screwUraniumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringUraniumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: rotorUraniumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickUraniumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickUraniumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickUraniumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickUraniumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearUraniumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltUraniumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltUraniumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: screwUraniumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearUraniumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickUraniumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtUraniumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringUraniumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: rotorUraniumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickUraniumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringUraniumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: dustFluorine was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtUraniumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockUraniumHexafluoride has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearUraniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringUraniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickUraniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltUraniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickUraniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringUraniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickUraniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtUraniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickUraniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltUraniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickUraniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongUraniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickUraniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickUraniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickUraniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongUraniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: screwUraniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringUraniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: rotorUraniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickUraniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickUraniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickUraniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickUraniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearUraniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltUraniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltUraniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: screwUraniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearUraniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickUraniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtUraniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringUraniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: rotorUraniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickUraniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringUraniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: dustFluorine was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtUraniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockZirconiumTetrafluoride has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearZirconiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringZirconiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickZirconiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltZirconiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickZirconiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringZirconiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickZirconiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtZirconiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickZirconiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltZirconiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickZirconiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongZirconiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickZirconiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickZirconiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickZirconiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongZirconiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: screwZirconiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringZirconiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: rotorZirconiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickZirconiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickZirconiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickZirconiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickZirconiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearZirconiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltZirconiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltZirconiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: screwZirconiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearZirconiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickZirconiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtZirconiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringZirconiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: rotorZirconiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickZirconiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringZirconiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: dustFluorine was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtZirconiumTetrafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockNeptuniumHexafluoride has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearNeptuniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringNeptuniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickNeptuniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltNeptuniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickNeptuniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringNeptuniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickNeptuniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtNeptuniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickNeptuniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltNeptuniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickNeptuniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongNeptuniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickNeptuniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickNeptuniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickNeptuniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongNeptuniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: screwNeptuniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringNeptuniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: rotorNeptuniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickNeptuniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickNeptuniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickNeptuniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickNeptuniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearNeptuniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltNeptuniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltNeptuniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: screwNeptuniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearNeptuniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickNeptuniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtNeptuniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringNeptuniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: rotorNeptuniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickNeptuniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringNeptuniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: dustFluorine was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtNeptuniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockTechnetiumHexafluoride has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearTechnetiumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringTechnetiumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickTechnetiumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltTechnetiumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickTechnetiumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringTechnetiumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickTechnetiumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtTechnetiumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickTechnetiumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltTechnetiumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickTechnetiumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongTechnetiumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickTechnetiumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickTechnetiumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickTechnetiumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongTechnetiumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: screwTechnetiumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringTechnetiumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: rotorTechnetiumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickTechnetiumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickTechnetiumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickTechnetiumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickTechnetiumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearTechnetiumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltTechnetiumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltTechnetiumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: screwTechnetiumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearTechnetiumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickTechnetiumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtTechnetiumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringTechnetiumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: rotorTechnetiumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickTechnetiumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringTechnetiumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: dustFluorine was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtTechnetiumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockSeleniumHexafluoride has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearSeleniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringSeleniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickSeleniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltSeleniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickSeleniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringSeleniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickSeleniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtSeleniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickSeleniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltSeleniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickSeleniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongSeleniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickSeleniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickSeleniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickSeleniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongSeleniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: screwSeleniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringSeleniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: rotorSeleniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickSeleniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickSeleniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickSeleniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickSeleniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearSeleniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltSeleniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: boltSeleniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: screwSeleniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearSeleniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickSeleniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtSeleniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringSeleniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: rotorSeleniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickSeleniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringSeleniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: dustFluorine was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtSeleniumHexafluoride was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockLiFBeF2ZrF4U235 has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearLiFBeF2ZrF4U235 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLiFBeF2ZrF4U235 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLiFBeF2ZrF4U235 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongLiFBeF2ZrF4U235 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLiFBeF2ZrF4U235 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLiFBeF2ZrF4U235 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLiFBeF2ZrF4U235 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongLiFBeF2ZrF4U235 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearLiFBeF2ZrF4U235 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLiFBeF2ZrF4U235 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtLiFBeF2ZrF4U235 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringLiFBeF2ZrF4U235 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: rotorLiFBeF2ZrF4U235 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLiFBeF2ZrF4U235 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringLiFBeF2ZrF4U235 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtLiFBeF2ZrF4U235 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockLiFBeF2ZrF4UF4 has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearLiFBeF2ZrF4UF4 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLiFBeF2ZrF4UF4 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLiFBeF2ZrF4UF4 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongLiFBeF2ZrF4UF4 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLiFBeF2ZrF4UF4 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLiFBeF2ZrF4UF4 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLiFBeF2ZrF4UF4 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongLiFBeF2ZrF4UF4 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearLiFBeF2ZrF4UF4 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLiFBeF2ZrF4UF4 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtLiFBeF2ZrF4UF4 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringLiFBeF2ZrF4UF4 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: rotorLiFBeF2ZrF4UF4 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLiFBeF2ZrF4UF4 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringLiFBeF2ZrF4UF4 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtLiFBeF2ZrF4UF4 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockLiFBeF2ThF4UF4 has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearLiFBeF2ThF4UF4 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLiFBeF2ThF4UF4 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLiFBeF2ThF4UF4 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongLiFBeF2ThF4UF4 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLiFBeF2ThF4UF4 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLiFBeF2ThF4UF4 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLiFBeF2ThF4UF4 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLongLiFBeF2ThF4UF4 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Found a recipe with an invalid output, yet had a valid inputs. Skipping.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: gearLiFBeF2ThF4UF4 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLiFBeF2ThF4UF4 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtLiFBeF2ThF4UF4 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringLiFBeF2ThF4UF4 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: rotorLiFBeF2ThF4UF4 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: stickLiFBeF2ThF4UF4 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: ringLiFBeF2ThF4UF4 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: frameGtLiFBeF2ThF4UF4 was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockEnergyCrystal has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name frameGtEnergyCrystal has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox.<init>(ItemBlockGtFrameBox.java:17)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:62)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer length: 4
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer is stacksizeVar null? true
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Dust Mixer Recipe: Energy Crystal - Success
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockBloodSteel has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name frameGtBloodSteel has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox.<init>(ItemBlockGtFrameBox.java:17)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:62)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer length: 2
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer is stacksizeVar null? true
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Dust Mixer Recipe: Blood Steel - Success
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockZeron100 has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name frameGtZeron100 has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox.<init>(ItemBlockGtFrameBox.java:17)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor117.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer length: 6
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockTumbaga has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name frameGtTumbaga has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox.<init>(ItemBlockGtFrameBox.java:17)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor117.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer length: 3
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer is stacksizeVar null? true
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Dust Mixer Recipe: Tumbaga - Success
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockPotin has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name frameGtPotin has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox.<init>(ItemBlockGtFrameBox.java:17)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor117.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer length: 3
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer is stacksizeVar null? true
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Dust Mixer Recipe: Potin - Success
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockStaballoy has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name frameGtStaballoy has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox.<init>(ItemBlockGtFrameBox.java:17)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor117.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer length: 2
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer is stacksizeVar null? true
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Dust Mixer Recipe: Staballoy - Success
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockTantalloy60 has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name frameGtTantalloy60 has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox.<init>(ItemBlockGtFrameBox.java:17)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor117.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer length: 2
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer is stacksizeVar null? true
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Dust Mixer Recipe: Tantalloy-60 - Success
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockTantalloy61 has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name frameGtTantalloy61 has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox.<init>(ItemBlockGtFrameBox.java:17)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor117.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer length: 3
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer is stacksizeVar null? true
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Dust Mixer Recipe: Tantalloy-61 - Success
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockInconel625 has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name frameGtInconel625 has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox.<init>(ItemBlockGtFrameBox.java:17)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor117.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer length: 4
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer is stacksizeVar null? true
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Dust Mixer Recipe: Inconel-625 - Success
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockInconel690 has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name frameGtInconel690 has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox.<init>(ItemBlockGtFrameBox.java:17)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor117.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer length: 4
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer is stacksizeVar null? true
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Dust Mixer Recipe: Inconel-690 - Success
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockInconel792 has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name frameGtInconel792 has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox.<init>(ItemBlockGtFrameBox.java:17)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor117.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer length: 4
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer is stacksizeVar null? true
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Dust Mixer Recipe: Inconel-792 - Success
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockEglinSteel has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name frameGtEglinSteel has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox.<init>(ItemBlockGtFrameBox.java:17)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor117.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer length: 4
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer is stacksizeVar null? true
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Dust Mixer Recipe: Eglin Steel - Success
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockMaragingSteel250 has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name frameGtMaragingSteel250 has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox.<init>(ItemBlockGtFrameBox.java:17)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor117.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer length: 5
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockMaragingSteel300 has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name frameGtMaragingSteel300 has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox.<init>(ItemBlockGtFrameBox.java:17)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor117.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer length: 5
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockMaragingSteel350 has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name frameGtMaragingSteel350 has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox.<init>(ItemBlockGtFrameBox.java:17)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor117.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer length: 5
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockStellite has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name frameGtStellite has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox.<init>(ItemBlockGtFrameBox.java:17)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor117.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer length: 4
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer is stacksizeVar null? true
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Dust Mixer Recipe: Stellite - Success
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockTalonite has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name frameGtTalonite has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox.<init>(ItemBlockGtFrameBox.java:17)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor117.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer length: 4
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer is stacksizeVar null? true
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Dust Mixer Recipe: Talonite - Success
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockHastelloyW has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name frameGtHastelloyW has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox.<init>(ItemBlockGtFrameBox.java:17)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor117.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer length: 4
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer is stacksizeVar null? true
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Dust Mixer Recipe: Hastelloy-W - Success
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockHastelloyX has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name frameGtHastelloyX has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox.<init>(ItemBlockGtFrameBox.java:17)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor117.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer length: 4
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer is stacksizeVar null? true
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Dust Mixer Recipe: Hastelloy-X - Success
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockHastelloyC276 has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name frameGtHastelloyC276 has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox.<init>(ItemBlockGtFrameBox.java:17)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor117.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer length: 4
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer is stacksizeVar null? true
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Dust Mixer Recipe: Hastelloy-C276 - Success
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockHastelloyN has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name frameGtHastelloyN has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox.<init>(ItemBlockGtFrameBox.java:17)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor117.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer length: 4
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer is stacksizeVar null? true
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Dust Mixer Recipe: Hastelloy-N - Success
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockIncoloy020 has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name frameGtIncoloy020 has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox.<init>(ItemBlockGtFrameBox.java:17)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor117.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer length: 4
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer is stacksizeVar null? true
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Dust Mixer Recipe: Incoloy-020 - Success
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockIncoloyDS has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name frameGtIncoloyDS has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox.<init>(ItemBlockGtFrameBox.java:17)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor117.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Trying with Gt 5.9 Method.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer length: 4
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer is stacksizeVar null? true
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Dust Mixer Recipe: Incoloy-DS - Success
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockIncoloyMA956 has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name frameGtIncoloyMA956 has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox.<init>(ItemBlockGtFrameBox.java:17)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor117.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer length: 4
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer is stacksizeVar null? true
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: Dust Mixer Recipe: Incoloy-MA956 - Success
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockGrisium has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name frameGtGrisium has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox.<init>(ItemBlockGtFrameBox.java:17)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor117.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: dustHydrogen was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: dustHydrogen was not valid.
[20:21:41] [Client thread/INFO] [GT++]: mixer length: 6
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name blockQuantum has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtBlock.<init>(ItemBlockGtBlock.java:40)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor116.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: * A broken ore dictionary registration with name frameGtQuantum has occurred. It adds an item (type: class gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox) which is currently unknown to the game registry. This dictionary item can only support a single value when registered with ores like this, and NO I am not going to turn this spam off. Just register your ore dictionary entries after the GameRegistry.
TO USERS: YES this is a BUG in the mod GT++ report it to them!
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOreImpl(OreDictionary.java:534)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at net.minecraftforge.oredict.OreDictionary.registerOre(OreDictionary.java:501)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gregtech.api.util.GT_OreDictUnificator.registerOre(GT_OreDictUnificator.java:238)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at gtPlusPlus.core.item.base.itemblock.ItemBlockGtFrameBox.<init>(ItemBlockGtFrameBox.java:17)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor117.newInstance(Unknown Source)
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: *  at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)...
[20:21:41] [Client thread/WARN] [FML]: ****************************************