-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 120
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Backport] sbt.internal.inc.Position: record range information #580
Conversation
This is a backport of sbt#571 to the 1.2.x branch.
A validation involving this pull request is in progress... |
The validator has checked the following projects against Scala 2.12,
❌ The result is: FAILED |
The validator failure looks like an external problem: [error] java.lang.RuntimeException:
[error]
[error] Fatal: multiple projects have the same artifacts visible in the same space.
[error]
[error] org.scala-sbt#zinc-classpath from sbt212-zinc and sbt212-zinc, both visible in space "sbt212"
[error] org.scala-sbt#zinc-apiinfo from sbt212-zinc and sbt212-zinc, both visible in space "sbt212"
[error] org.scala-sbt#zinc-classfile from sbt212-zinc and sbt212-zinc, both visible in space "sbt212"
[error] org.scala-sbt#compiler-bridge from sbt212-zinc and sbt212-zinc, both visible in space "sbt212"
[error]
[error] at scala.sys.package$.error(package.scala:27)
[error] at com.typesafe.dbuild.model.RepeatableDBuildConfig.<init>(RepeatableBuild.scala:158)
[error] at com.typesafe.dbuild.model.RepeatableDBuildConfigH$.fromExtractionOutcome(RepeatableBuild.scala:71)
Shutting down, please wait...
Result: EXTRACTION FAILED (Cause: RuntimeException: )
Build failed after: 00h 02m 47.1s
All done.
/tmp/jenkins1188539459569619282.sh: line 305: jq: command not found |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, I leave this up to Eugene or Dale to merge.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
This was forgotten in sbt#580. We need to define asProduct13 ourselves since it's missing from sbinary, see sbt/sbinary#17
This was forgotten in sbt#580. Also bump sbinary to 0.5.0 to make `asProduct13` from sbt/sbinary#17 available.
Follow-up to the fields added in #580, and add Problem#rendered
This was forgotten in sbt#580. Also bump sbinary to 0.5.0 to make `asProduct13` from sbt/sbinary#17 available.
This is a backport of #571 to the 1.2.x branch.