Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add benchmark suite for weiner and inverse functions #3316

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

abarya
Copy link
Contributor

@abarya abarya commented Aug 3, 2018

Description

The running time for both the functions is approximately 1.5s.

Checklist

[It's fine to submit PRs which are a work in progress! But before they are merged, all PRs should provide:]

[For detailed information on these and other aspects see scikit-image contribution guidelines]

References

[If this is a bug-fix or enhancement, it closes issue # ]
[If this is a new feature, it implements the following paper: ]

For reviewers

(Don't remove the checklist below.)

  • Check that the PR title is short, concise, and will make sense 1 year
    later.
  • Check that new functions are imported in corresponding __init__.py.
  • Check that new features, API changes, and deprecations are mentioned in
    doc/release/release_dev.rst.
  • Consider backporting the PR with @meeseeksdev backport to v0.14.x

@abarya
Copy link
Contributor Author

abarya commented Aug 6, 2018

@soupault @jni Please review.

@soupault
Copy link
Member

Waiting for the decision on #3319 (comment).

self.image = np.random.random((4000, 4000))
self.image[:2000, :2000] += 1
self.image[3000:, 3000] += 0.5
self.image = np.random.random((600, 600))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why did you decrease the size of the image? I think the idea of having a large enough image was to have an example close to demanding applications, which is more interesting for a benchmark than small images.

@soupault soupault modified the milestones: 0.15, 0.16 Apr 20, 2019
@sciunto sciunto removed this from the 0.16 milestone May 2, 2020
Base automatically changed from master to main February 18, 2021 18:23
@abarya abarya closed this Sep 30, 2022
@lagru
Copy link
Member

lagru commented Sep 30, 2022

Hey @abarya, I may be missing some context here but I guess this did not get enough attention by reviewers? Sorry for that. Did you close it because you are unable to continue or would you reopen if I were to commit some review time? Otherwise I might make a "Good first issue" out of this. 😉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants