Prep 0.20.0rc0 #6706
Merged
Prep 0.20.0rc0 #6706
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
stefanv
approved these changes
Jan 27, 2023
|
|
||
| Other and development related updates | ||
| ------------------------------------- | ||
| .. Everything invisible to a user of scikit-image or not covered in the above section. These changes probably not interesting to users. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| .. Everything invisible to a user of scikit-image or not covered in the above section. These changes probably not interesting to users. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The remaining comments all relate to autogenerated text. I will address this in a future PR after 0.20.0rc0.
| - Add a textbook-like tutorial on measuring fluorescence at the nuclear envelope of a cell | ||
| (`#5262 <https://github.com/scikit-image/scikit-image/pull/5262>`_). | ||
|
|
||
| 66 authors added to this release [alphabetical by first name or login] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| 66 authors added to this release [alphabetical by first name or login] | |
| 66 authors contributed to this release [alphabetical by first name or login] |
contributed to? worked on?
| - Elena Pascal | ||
| - Eli Schwartz | ||
| - Fabian Schneider | ||
| - forgeRW |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For cases without real names, should we add @ in front?
| - Tim-Oliver Buchholz | ||
| - Tyler Reddy | ||
|
|
||
| 37 reviewers added to this release [alphabetical by first name or login] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| 37 reviewers added to this release [alphabetical by first name or login] | |
| 37 reviewers worked on this release [alphabetical by first name or login] |
|
|
||
| Other and development related updates | ||
| ------------------------------------- | ||
| .. Everything invisible to a user of scikit-image or not covered in the above section. These changes probably not interesting to users. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should probably keep these comments? You can maybe just grab the previous release_dev.rst template.
jarrodmillman
force-pushed
the
prep-0.20.0rc0
branch
from
be09a28
to
cc6c5ca
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Checklist
./doc/examples(new features only)./benchmarks, if your changes aren't covered by anexisting benchmark
For reviewers
later.
__init__.py.doc/release/release_dev.rst.example, to backport to v0.19.x after merging, add the following in a PR
comment:
@meeseeksdev backport to v0.19.xrun-benchmarklabel. To rerun, the labelcan be removed and then added again. The benchmark output can be checked in
the "Actions" tab.