You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks much for this great library.
Here is the problem I'm facing:
As you can see, after a fit, I get the items assigned to cluster 2 and pass them to approximate_predict and I was a bit surprised to see that some of them are declared outliers. Then I decided to try membership_vector , but again the results are kind of unexpected to me , as you can see the 4th element (that was declared outlier by approximate_predict) now it seems to have quite a high probability of being in cluster 1 or at least that's how I interpret it.
Am I missing something, or :/ ?
I'm using version 0.8.25 , python 3.6
EDIT:
I found this comment in another issue:
"Even when that arg is not used, the argmax of probabilities generated by soft_clusters is often not the same as the cluster that is actually assigned." #360
Thanks much and keep going with this project!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hey there,
Thanks much for this great library.
Here is the problem I'm facing:
As you can see, after a fit, I get the items assigned to cluster 2 and pass them to
approximate_predict
and I was a bit surprised to see that some of them are declared outliers. Then I decided to trymembership_vector
, but again the results are kind of unexpected to me , as you can see the 4th element (that was declared outlier byapproximate_predict
) now it seems to have quite a high probability of being in cluster 1 or at least that's how I interpret it.Am I missing something, or :/ ?
I'm using version 0.8.25 , python 3.6
EDIT:
I found this comment in another issue:
"Even when that arg is not used, the argmax of probabilities generated by soft_clusters is often not the same as the cluster that is actually assigned." #360
Thanks much and keep going with this project!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: