Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Master key revision 7? #74

Closed
Mc-muffin opened this issue May 4, 2019 · 6 comments
Closed

Master key revision 7? #74

Mc-muffin opened this issue May 4, 2019 · 6 comments

Comments

@Mc-muffin
Copy link

Mc-muffin commented May 4, 2019

Basically, I'm trying to extract the romfs from a NSP, but the tool says that section 0 and 1 are corrupted, the only thing worth noting is that the Master Key Revision field says 7 (Unknown)

@thomasnet-mc
Copy link

7 (Unknown) is just that it wasn't updated to show 7.x+. Do you have correct keys and is the NCA using Rights ID crypto ?

@Mc-muffin
Copy link
Author

Oh, I see, that means I would need 7.x+ keys, right? And no, it's using Titlekey crypto.

@thomasnet-mc
Copy link

Rights ID crypto = titlekey crypto.
And yes, you need the 7 master key and app kaek.

@Mc-muffin
Copy link
Author

Mc-muffin commented May 4, 2019

Rights ID crypto = titlekey crypto. Oh, I'm dumb x)
Well, time to redump the keys. I'll close the issue, if (for some reason) doesn't work I will just reopen it.

@shchmue
Copy link
Collaborator

shchmue commented May 4, 2019

an NSP doesn't have a romfs btw you need to extract the NCAs from it with -t pfs0 --pfs0dir= then get romfs from the NCAs inside

it sounds like you might've been inadvertently treating an NSP as an NCA

@Mc-muffin
Copy link
Author

Yep, I'm aware of that, and you are right for some reason I said NSP on my post but meant NCA, sorry :s
And, thomasnet-mc was right after redumping the keys it worked right away! Thanks again both of you :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants