Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

euphemism policy? #79

Closed
mmwwah opened this issue Nov 18, 2015 · 4 comments
Closed

euphemism policy? #79

mmwwah opened this issue Nov 18, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@mmwwah
Copy link
Collaborator

mmwwah commented Nov 18, 2015

Do we have a policy for euphemisms and #bio references? At the moment I'm looking at Min Drihhten, but I can imagine all other kinds of euphemisms. Bio-tag them or no? (And should we add a line in the Guidelines accordingly?)

@scottkleinman
Copy link
Owner

Any encoding of this type would be on top of the minimal markup schema, so there's no policy in place. Initially, I'm not sure that we'll be able to implement search functionality in the AEME interface, but one can easily open the code and use control+F with the @xml:id (or script it if one has the technical competence).

But this does raise a question. If you want to include this information, is there a standard why of encoding it? I think the standard TEI method would be as follows. Assuming God is defined somewhere as @xml:id="God":

<name type="person" ref="#God">Godd</name>, <seg corresp="#God">Min Drihhten</seg>

See http://www.tei-c.org/release/doc/tei-p5-doc/en/html/SA.html#SACS. Is there any reason why AEME may need a different or procedure from (or more restrictive procedure than) standard TEI?

@mmwwah
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mmwwah commented Nov 18, 2015

I guess I was being more naive about it. I was envisioning something like this:
<name type="person" ref="#bioGod001">Min Drihhten</name>

@scottkleinman
Copy link
Owner

Ah yes, that's that little dance of making the markup semantic. "Min Drihhten" isn't a name, so you don't want to use <name>. So the question is whether the TEI drihhtenness have thought of a semantic alternative. I think in this case they have.

@mmwwah
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mmwwah commented Nov 18, 2015

Right. Got it.

I think I'll skip the euphemisms for now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants