-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
cod-pipoql_bt67yj-k23899.xml
153 lines (153 loc) · 9.15 KB
/
cod-pipoql_bt67yj-k23899.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Capitulum 1</title>
<author ref="#WillemHesselsVanEst">Guillelmus Estius</author>
<respStmt>
<name ref="#jeffreycwitt">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>Transcription Editor</resp>
<resp>TEI Encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Capitulum 1</title>
<date when="2024-01-21">January 21, 2024</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>SCTA</authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="P" n="cod-pipoql">Paris 1696, v. 1</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-diplomatic-1.0.0" url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a diplomatic edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2024-01-21" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#P" n="64"/>
<cb ed="#P" n="b"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="bt67yj-k23899"><!-- l1d16c1" -->
<head xml:id="bt67yj-k23899-Hd1e101">Capitulum 1</head>
<head xml:id="bt67yj-k23899-Hd1e103" type="question-title">Quomodo visibiliter missi filius
et Spiritus sanctus</head>
<p xml:id="bt67yj-k23899-d1e106">
<lb ed="#P" n="82"/>IN DISTINCTIONEM
<lb ed="#P" n="83"/>DECIMAMSEXTAM.
<lb ed="#P" n="84"/>§. 1. Quomodo visibiliter missi filius
<lb ed="#P" n="85"/>& Spiritus sanctus.
</p>
<p xml:id="bt67yj-k23899-d1e117">
<lb ed="#P" n="86"/>NULTIPLICES modi quibus missus legitur
<lb ed="#P" n="87"/>vel filius vel spiritus sanctus, contrahi
pos<lb ed="#P" n="88" break="no"/>IAsunt ad duo genera, scilicet ad
missio<lb ed="#P" n="89" break="no"/>nem visibilem & invisibilem. Ac de invisibili
qui<lb ed="#P" n="90" break="no"/>dem missione agetur duabus distinct. proxime
se<lb ed="#P" n="91" break="no"/>quentibus. Hic autem de visibili agendum.
</p>
<p xml:id="bt67yj-k23899-d1e133">
<lb ed="#P" n="92"/>
<pc type="indent"/> Visibilis missio dicitur, quae fit per subjectam
crea<lb ed="#P" n="93" break="no"/>turam sensui expositam, qua persona, quae mitti
dici<lb ed="#P" n="94" break="no"/>tur, aliquo modo repraesentetur. Quod etsi interdum
<lb ed="#P" n="95"/>fiat per alium sensum quam visum, ideoque
genera<lb ed="#P" n="96" break="no"/>liter haec missio sensibilis dici possit, recte tamen
<lb ed="#P" n="97"/>visibilis dicitur a sensu principaliori, & hac in re
fre<lb ed="#P" n="98" break="no"/>quentiori. Missus est autem visibiliter filius, semel
<lb ed="#P" n="99"/>duntaxat excellenti & singulari modo, quando
as<lb ed="#P" n="100" break="no"/>sumpta natura humana, inter homines, homo
visibi<lb ed="#P" n="101" break="no"/>lis apparuit. Alias vero apparuit eo modo filius Dei
<lb ed="#P" n="102"/>hommibus, quo & reliquas personas subinde
appa<lb ed="#P" n="103" break="no"/>ruisse, in sacris literis didicimus velut Gen. 18. & 32.
<lb ed="#P" n="104"/>Exod. 3. & 20. Isa. 6. Dan. 3. & 7. Apoc. 1. & alibi.
<lb ed="#P" n="105"/>His autem modis apparens filius recte etiam missus
<lb ed="#P" n="106"/>fuisse dicitur. Spiritus sanctus saepenumero visibiliter
<lb ed="#P" n="107"/>missus legitur. Primo quando in specie columbae
su<lb ed="#P" n="108" break="no"/>per Christum in ejus baptismo descendit. Secundo
<lb ed="#P" n="109"/>quando post resurrectionem suam Christus insufflans
<lb ed="#P" n="110"/>in Discipulos, dixit: Accipite Spiritum sanctum.
<lb ed="#P" n="111"/>Hoc enim dicens, spiritum sanctum, flatu illo
cor<lb ed="#P" n="112" break="no"/>poreo, quem ex ore exspirabat, significatum esse
<lb ed="#P" n="113"/>voluit. Tertio quando die Pentecostes, sonitu facto
<lb ed="#P" n="114"/>tanquam spiritus vehementis, apparuerunt supra
Dis<lb ed="#P" n="115" break="no"/>cipulos dispertitae linguae tanquam ignis. Nam in
<lb ed="#P" n="116"/>his quatuor, sono, vento, linguis & igne
repraesen<lb ed="#P" n="117" break="no"/>tatus tunc fuit spiritus sanctus. His addere licet
<lb ed="#P" n="118"/>ejusdem apparitionem, de qua Gen. 18. ubi Sancto
<lb ed="#P" n="119"/>Abrahae Trinitas apparuit in specie trium hominum.
<lb ed="#P" n="120"/>Unde Ecclesia: Tres vidit & unum adoravit.
</p>
<p xml:id="bt67yj-k23899-d1e202">
<lb ed="#P" n="121"/>
<pc type="indent"/> Pater, etsi aliquando praesentiam suam sensibili
si<lb ed="#P" n="122" break="no"/>gno declaravit, velut quando vox ejus audita est de
<lb ed="#P" n="123"/>nube dicentis: Hic est filius meus dilectus, &c. Matth.
<lb ed="#P" n="124"/>17. quando Joan. 12. rursum vox Patris a turbis
au<lb ed="#P" n="125" break="no"/>dita est dicentis: Et clarificavi & iterum clarificabo:
<lb ed="#P" n="126"/>Quando Danieli Prophetae visus est, tanquam
anti<lb ed="#P" n="127" break="no"/>quus dierum Dan. 7. Quando etiam Abrahae, ut
<lb ed="#P" n="128"/>jam dictum est, apparuit, unus inter tres viros a se
<lb ed="#P" n="129"/>susceptos hospitio Genes. 18. (qua de re videatu
<lb ed="#P" n="130"/>Augustinus lib. 2. de Trinitate cap. ult.) non
ta<lb ed="#P" n="131" break="no"/>men visibiliter missus dicendus est, sed visibiliter aut
<lb ed="#P" n="132"/>sensibiliter advenisse. Sicut enim invisibiliter
adve<lb ed="#P" n="133" break="no"/>nit, nec tamen mittitur, quando mansionem suam
<lb ed="#P" n="134"/>facit in homine juxta scripturam Joan. 14. ita
visibi<lb ed="#P" n="135" break="no"/>liter advenit, nec tamen missus fuit secundum jam
<lb ed="#P" n="136"/>dictas apparitiones, quia propria missionis ratio,
si<lb ed="#P" n="137" break="no"/>ve ea visibilis, sive invisibilis intelligatur, in patrem
<lb ed="#P" n="138"/>non competit, ut supra satis ostensum est.
</p>
<p xml:id="bt67yj-k23899-d1e246">
<lb ed="#P" n="139"/>
<pc type="indent"/> Quales autem fuerint subjectae creaturae, per quas
<lb ed="#P" n="140"/>humanis sensibus exhiltae leguntur personae
divi<lb ed="#P" n="141" break="no"/>nae, excepta illa carne quam in unitate personae
as<lb ed="#P" n="142" break="no"/>sumptam a verbo Dei secundum fidem Catholicam
<!--0088.xml-->
<pb ed="#P" n="65"/>
<cb ed="#P" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#P" n="1"/>non est dubitandum, ita disputat Augustinus lib. 4.
<lb ed="#P" n="2"/>de Trinitate cap. ult. ut nec dubitet ejusmodi veras
<lb ed="#P" n="3"/>fuisse creaturas: Sed utrum tantummodo corporales
<lb ed="#P" n="4"/>atque sensibiles fuerint, an vero adhibito etiam
spi<lb ed="#P" n="5" break="no"/>ritu rationali, vel intellectuali apparuerint, non ad
<lb ed="#P" n="6"/>unitatem personae; sed tantummodo ad ministerium
<lb ed="#P" n="7"/>peragendae sanctificationis, non audet definire.
Ve<lb ed="#P" n="8" break="no"/>rumtamen existimat ante Christi incarnationem
<lb ed="#P" n="9"/>Deum hujusmodi signa operatum fuisse per angelos,
<lb ed="#P" n="10"/>idque scripturis ostendit esse consentaneum.
Quam<lb ed="#P" n="11" break="no"/>quam & post incarnationem verbi, quoties similia
si<lb ed="#P" n="12" break="no"/>gna exhibita sunt, aut exhibentur, non sine rationali
<lb ed="#P" n="13"/>vel intellectuali creatura exhiberi, probabilius
opi<lb ed="#P" n="14" break="no"/>natur. Sed de hac re plura ex professo ad dist. 8. lib. 2.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>