Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed multi-scale image/label handling #131

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Aug 2, 2023

Conversation

timtreis
Copy link
Member

@timtreis timtreis commented Aug 1, 2023

No description provided.

@timtreis timtreis linked an issue Aug 1, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #131 (e6f496c) into main (267922a) will decrease coverage by 0.51%.
The diff coverage is 60.00%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #131      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   76.94%   76.44%   -0.51%     
==========================================
  Files          10       10              
  Lines        1206     1210       +4     
==========================================
- Hits          928      925       -3     
- Misses        278      285       +7     
Files Changed Coverage Δ
src/spatialdata_plot/pl/basic.py 84.15% <ø> (-0.09%) ⬇️
src/spatialdata_plot/pl/render.py 90.79% <60.00%> (-0.66%) ⬇️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

@timtreis timtreis changed the title Moved multi-scale flattening into render_images Fixed multi-scale image/label handling Aug 1, 2023
@review-notebook-app
Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@timtreis timtreis merged commit d577db7 into main Aug 2, 2023
6 checks passed
@timtreis timtreis deleted the bugfix/issue129-blobs-example-does-not-work branch August 2, 2023 08:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

blobs() example does not work
2 participants