Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

treewide: use Software Package Data Exchange (SPDX) license identifiers #9937

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

avikivity
Copy link
Member

Instead of lengthy blurbs, switch to single-line, machine-readable
standardized (https://spdx.dev) license identifiers. The Linux kernel
switched long ago, so there is strong precedent.

Three cases are handled: AGPL-only, Apache-only, and dual licensed.
For the latter case, I chose (AGPL-3.0-or-later and Apache-2.0),
reasoning that our changes are extensive enough to apply our license.

The changes we applied mechanically with a script, except to
licenses/README.md.

Instead of lengthy blurbs, switch to single-line, machine-readable
standardized (https://spdx.dev) license identifiers. The Linux kernel
switched long ago, so there is strong precedent.

Three cases are handled: AGPL-only, Apache-only, and dual licensed.
For the latter case, I chose (AGPL-3.0-or-later and Apache-2.0),
reasoning that our changes are extensive enough to apply our license.

The changes we applied mechanically with a script, except to
licenses/README.md.
Copy link
Contributor

@psarna psarna left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm approving with a veto period of 1 day, and I'm going to merge the patch tomorrow. Or, if another maintainer also agrees that it's a good idea, feel free to just merge

@raphaelsc
Copy link
Member

raphaelsc commented Jan 17, 2022

removing ~27k lines from the sources sounds like a good thing to me :-)

@psarna
Copy link
Contributor

psarna commented Jan 18, 2022

Time's up - thanks everyone for not vetoing!

@kbr-
Copy link
Contributor

kbr- commented Jan 18, 2022

removing ~27k lines from the sources sounds like a good thing to me :-)

and it feels good
image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants