We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Considering the following UDO
define operator my_func (p1 string default "p1", p2 string default "p2", p3 string default "p3", p4 string default "p4", p5 string default "p5", p6 string default "p6", p7 string default "p7", p8 string default "p8", p9 string default "p9", p10 string default "p10") returns dataset is ... end operator;
Instantiate it overriding the 8th parameter only, has to be:
my_func(_,_,_,_,_,_,_,"P8", "P999")
It's not very pretty, and a source of error.
Enable to instantiate functions with positional parameters, named parameters, mix, like Python does. It would be helpful:
my_func(p8="P8", p9="P999")
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I would hope to never encounter am operator with 9 parameters, but I agree nevertheless
Sorry, something went wrong.
I hope too but the example is in the abuse to demonstrate the concern
Agree
No branches or pull requests
Issue Description
Considering the following UDO
Instantiate it overriding the 8th parameter only, has to be:
my_func(_,_,_,_,_,_,_,"P8", "P999")
It's not very pretty, and a source of error.
Proposed Solution
Enable to instantiate functions with positional parameters, named parameters, mix, like Python does.
It would be helpful:
my_func(p8="P8", p9="P999")
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: