Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

layout_thread: Avoid adding the UA sheets multiple times when there's no root flow. #18696

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Oct 3, 2017

Conversation

emilio
Copy link
Member

@emilio emilio commented Oct 1, 2017

This change is Reviewable

@highfive highfive added the S-awaiting-review There is new code that needs to be reviewed. label Oct 1, 2017
@emilio
Copy link
Member Author

emilio commented Oct 1, 2017

r? @SimonSapin

@highfive highfive assigned SimonSapin and unassigned metajack Oct 1, 2017
@emilio
Copy link
Member Author

emilio commented Oct 1, 2017

@bors-servo try

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

⌛ Trying commit d061457 with merge edfd170...

bors-servo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 1, 2017
layout_thread: Avoid adding the UA sheets multiple times when there's no root flow.
@emilio
Copy link
Member Author

emilio commented Oct 1, 2017

fixes #18631

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

💔 Test failed - mac-rel-wpt4

@highfive highfive added the S-tests-failed The changes caused existing tests to fail. label Oct 1, 2017
@highfive highfive removed the S-tests-failed The changes caused existing tests to fail. label Oct 1, 2017
@emilio
Copy link
Member Author

emilio commented Oct 1, 2017

@bors-servo try

  • Fixed up the test so it doesn't time out.

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

⌛ Trying commit 8976b1a with merge 78b6b48...

bors-servo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 1, 2017
layout_thread: Avoid adding the UA sheets multiple times when there's no root flow.

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/18696)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

💔 Test failed - linux-rel-wpt

@highfive highfive added the S-tests-failed The changes caused existing tests to fail. label Oct 1, 2017
@emilio
Copy link
Member Author

emilio commented Oct 1, 2017

That's an unrelated test.

@jdm
Copy link
Member

jdm commented Oct 3, 2017

@bors-servo: r+

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

📌 Commit 8976b1a has been approved by jdm

@highfive highfive assigned jdm and unassigned SimonSapin Oct 3, 2017
@highfive highfive added S-awaiting-merge The PR is in the process of compiling and running tests on the automated CI. and removed S-awaiting-review There is new code that needs to be reviewed. S-tests-failed The changes caused existing tests to fail. labels Oct 3, 2017
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

⌛ Testing commit 8976b1a with merge 3dc4614...

bors-servo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2017
layout_thread: Avoid adding the UA sheets multiple times when there's no root flow.

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/18696)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

☀️ Test successful - android, arm32, arm64, linux-dev, linux-rel-css, linux-rel-wpt, mac-dev-unit, mac-rel-css1, mac-rel-css2, mac-rel-wpt1, mac-rel-wpt2, mac-rel-wpt3, mac-rel-wpt4, windows-msvc-dev
Approved by: jdm
Pushing 3dc4614 to master...

@bors-servo bors-servo merged commit 8976b1a into servo:master Oct 3, 2017
@highfive highfive removed the S-awaiting-merge The PR is in the process of compiling and running tests on the automated CI. label Oct 3, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants