Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use Rc::get_mut rather than deprecated rc::get_mut. #6469

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jun 26, 2015

Conversation

Ms2ger
Copy link
Contributor

@Ms2ger Ms2ger commented Jun 26, 2015

Review on Reviewable

@highfive highfive added the S-awaiting-review There is new code that needs to be reviewed. label Jun 26, 2015
@hoppipolla-critic-bot
Copy link

Critic review: https://critic.hoppipolla.co.uk/r/5382

This is an external review system which you may optionally use for the code review of your pull request.

In order to help critic track your changes, please do not make in-place history rewrites (e.g. via git rebase -i or git commit --amend) when updating this pull request.

@tetsuharuohzeki
Copy link
Contributor

@bors-servo r+

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

📌 Commit 932aa06 has been approved by saneyuki

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

⌛ Testing commit 932aa06 with merge ef97879...

bors-servo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 26, 2015
Use Rc::get_mut rather than deprecated rc::get_mut.



<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/6469)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

☀️ Test successful - android, gonk, linux1, linux2, linux3, mac1, mac2, mac3

@bors-servo bors-servo merged commit 932aa06 into servo:master Jun 26, 2015
@Ms2ger Ms2ger deleted the rc-mut branch June 27, 2015 13:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-awaiting-review There is new code that needs to be reviewed.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants