Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Using contigs or scaffolds instead of the assembly graph. #42

Closed
vappiah opened this issue Aug 2, 2020 · 5 comments
Closed

Using contigs or scaffolds instead of the assembly graph. #42

vappiah opened this issue Aug 2, 2020 · 5 comments

Comments

@vappiah
Copy link

vappiah commented Aug 2, 2020

Is it acceptable if i use the contig.fasta or scaffold.fasta file instead of the assembly graph as specified in the tutorial?

@dpellow
Copy link
Collaborator

dpellow commented Aug 2, 2020

The point of Recycler and it's successor SCAPP is that they use the structure of the assembly graph which encodes much more information than the contigs or scaffolds. These tools will not work with just the contig or scaffold files as these do not include the graph structure.
If you can let us know more about what you're trying to do we can help you run SCAPP or Recycler on your data.

@dpellow dpellow closed this as completed Aug 2, 2020
@vappiah
Copy link
Author

vappiah commented Aug 2, 2020

Thanks @dpellow. I have a single-end oxford nanopore reads of mycobacterium ulcerans which I want to identifly plasmids as well as visualize them in a circular function. I would be grateful if you can recommend some pipelines to do that. Thanks

@dpellow
Copy link
Collaborator

dpellow commented Aug 2, 2020

It sounds like you could use a plasmid sequence classifier such as our tool PlasClass, however it has not been tested on long reads. There may be some tools that are specifically for classifying long reads as plasmids.
For visualization you can try the tool called Bandage.

@vappiah
Copy link
Author

vappiah commented Aug 13, 2020

Hi @dpellow. I used SCAPP to predict plasmids from oxford nanopore draft assembly. It turns out that it was able to make an a good prediction. I blasted the contigs with high proba values and I got a hit from BLAST.
Kudos to the SCAPP team

@dpellow
Copy link
Collaborator

dpellow commented Aug 13, 2020

Great to hear that it worked on 3rd gen sequencing technology! Thanks for letting us know.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants