-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Using contigs or scaffolds instead of the assembly graph. #42
Comments
The point of Recycler and it's successor SCAPP is that they use the structure of the assembly graph which encodes much more information than the contigs or scaffolds. These tools will not work with just the contig or scaffold files as these do not include the graph structure. |
Thanks @dpellow. I have a single-end oxford nanopore reads of mycobacterium ulcerans which I want to identifly plasmids as well as visualize them in a circular function. I would be grateful if you can recommend some pipelines to do that. Thanks |
It sounds like you could use a plasmid sequence classifier such as our tool PlasClass, however it has not been tested on long reads. There may be some tools that are specifically for classifying long reads as plasmids. |
Hi @dpellow. I used SCAPP to predict plasmids from oxford nanopore draft assembly. It turns out that it was able to make an a good prediction. I blasted the contigs with high proba values and I got a hit from BLAST. |
Great to hear that it worked on 3rd gen sequencing technology! Thanks for letting us know. |
Is it acceptable if i use the contig.fasta or scaffold.fasta file instead of the assembly graph as specified in the tutorial?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: