You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There is a potential edge case right now when reading from audit table. Since the read uses the primary_key of the primary table, it may be out of order if two updates happen for the same row.
Its rather better to have a dedicated id field (PK) on the audit table, that way when reading we can have ordered entries w/o using a timestamp field
There is a potential edge case right now when reading from audit table. Since the read uses the primary_key of the primary table, it may be out of order if two updates happen for the same row.
Its rather better to have a dedicated id field (PK) on the audit table, that way when reading we can have ordered entries w/o using a timestamp field
pg-osc/lib/pg_online_schema_change/replay.rb
Line 32 in 4e48849
This field name, needs to be non conflicting (with primary table) as well. Similar to: #47
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: