You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The editor syntax highlighting in math sections is rendered just like regular MarkDown, as in underscores are interpreted as emphasis rather than subscripts:
It would be nice if it were styled similar to how GitHub styles LaTeX:
\[\begin{aligned} A \cup (B_1 \cap B_2 \cap\ldots\cap B_n) &= (A \cap B_1) \cup (A \cap B_2) \cup\ldots\cup (A \cap B_n) \\ A \cup (B_1 \cap B_2 \cap\ldots\cap B_{n+1}) &= (A \cap B_1) \cup (A \cap B_2) \cup\ldots\cup (A \cap B_{n+1}) \\ A \cup [(B_1 \cap B_2 \cap\ldots\cap B_n) \cap B_{n+1}] \\\space [A \cup (B_1 \cap B_2 \cap\ldots\cap B_n)] \cap (A \cup B_{n+1}) \\\end{aligned}\]
(The \space prefixing the last line is there because KaTeX errored when it began with [)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The problem is that this is an enhanced feature and not part of regular Markdown - the workaround would be to use a LaTeX code chunk, but that would mean having to write a whole LaTeX file in a code chuck for every formula - and it wouldn't work inline.
The editor syntax highlighting in math sections is rendered just like regular MarkDown, as in underscores are interpreted as emphasis rather than subscripts:
It would be nice if it were styled similar to how GitHub styles LaTeX:
(The
\space
prefixing the last line is there because KaTeX errored when it began with[
)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: