You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I love this library. It makes maintaining and even generating graphql clients super easy. While the approach of using structs is not as flexible when you need very specific custom queries as other approaches I do enjoy the type safety and ability to generate the structs programmatically from the graphql schema.
I've been using this library in my production code for over a year now but I've noticed that there have not been any meaningful code changes to this repo since 2018.
There are also plenty of open PRs and Issues with great improvements and suggestions and a handful of questions that need to be documented or closed.
This makes me feel this repo is no longer being maintained and that since i'm relying upon this library in production facing code I need to do 1 of 2 things to protect my interests.
Fork this library and start having my organization maintain it ourself
Contribute back if the powers that be would actually approve and merge the PRs (which it seems like thats already not the case given 16 open PRs and no new commits since 2018)
I've seen talk of a few other forks out there each with their own features but nothing universal. https://github.com/hasura/go-graphql-client seems to have the most newer features.
Since this library is a core utility to several production products at my company we are willing to take on maintainership.
@dmitshur or @shurcooL - is there something that we can do to help with maintainership? I really don't want to fork this and start maintaining my own as that just fractures the community even more but new features and improvements need to be added to help keep this repo alive and working well. Some of the bigger things to me are:
named queries
better HTTP client/transport that supports retry and backoff
verbose logging of query and response for easier debugging
support for subscription
native support for easily adding extra headers (functional options)
built in schema -> struct generator to help with quickstarting a client
add go.mod / go.sum
turning "question" issues answers into documentation
more examples of auth options, ways to handle usecases, and a list completed clients
There is lots of work I'd like my team to contribute back with so everyone benefits but if there is no active maintainership here then I'm left to forking :(
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello Reader,
I love this library. It makes maintaining and even generating graphql clients super easy. While the approach of using structs is not as flexible when you need very specific custom queries as other approaches I do enjoy the type safety and ability to generate the structs programmatically from the graphql schema.
I've been using this library in my production code for over a year now but I've noticed that there have not been any meaningful code changes to this repo since 2018.
There are also plenty of open PRs and Issues with great improvements and suggestions and a handful of questions that need to be documented or closed.
This makes me feel this repo is no longer being maintained and that since i'm relying upon this library in production facing code I need to do 1 of 2 things to protect my interests.
I've seen talk of a few other forks out there each with their own features but nothing universal. https://github.com/hasura/go-graphql-client seems to have the most newer features.
Since this library is a core utility to several production products at my company we are willing to take on maintainership.
@dmitshur or @shurcooL - is there something that we can do to help with maintainership? I really don't want to fork this and start maintaining my own as that just fractures the community even more but new features and improvements need to be added to help keep this repo alive and working well. Some of the bigger things to me are:
There is lots of work I'd like my team to contribute back with so everyone benefits but if there is no active maintainership here then I'm left to forking :(
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: