🥶👜 ↝ Posts with large meta/tags overlap other components #12
Assignees
Labels
bug
Something isn't working
documentation
Improvements or additions to documentation
duplicate
This issue or pull request already exists
Comments
Gizmotronn
added
bug
Gizmotronn
added a commit
to Signal-K/sytizen
that referenced
this issue
Jan 14, 2023
Also working on building out the frontend for #16 -> see Signal-K/Silfur#28 & Signal-K/Silfur#26 & Signal-K/Silfur#24 & Signal-K/Silfur#25 & Signal-K/Silfur#21 & Signal-K/Silfur#22 Frontend components are being built out on the signal-k/client repo: Signal-K/client#12 Contract: https://thirdweb.com/0xCdc5929e1158F7f0B320e3B942528E6998D8b25c/PlanetHelper, https://www.notion.so/skinetics/Sample-Planets-Contract-4c3bdcbca4b9450382f9cc4e72e081f7#73801895fc5a421bbf57801a33a775c7 Claiming mints: ```sol function verifyClaim( address _claimer, uint256 _tokenId, uint256 _quantity ) public view override { require (_tokenId == 0, 'Only first NFT is claimable'); require (_quantity == 1, 'Only 1 NFT can be claimed at a time'); } ``` Multitool base documentation: https://skinetics.notion.site/Planet-Mining-multitool-8310fa1cd188440688bbcc19692b3b67 Contract README: > # Planets > > > ## Confirmed Planets Contract > > Documentation: [https://skinetics.notion.site/Sample-Planets-Contract-4c3bdcbca4b9450382f9cc4e72e081f7](https://www.notion.so/Sample-Planets-Contract-4c3bdcbca4b9450382f9cc4e72e081f7) > > - User mints an anomaly that has appeared in their UI (for now, the webapp, later it will be the game as well) > - API searches for a token that has already been lazy minted with the TIC id of the anomaly (or the identifier of the candidate) > - If there is a token id that has the TIC Id, then claim a copy of that to the `msg.sender` (player’s address) so they can manipulate it in-game > - If the TIC ID has never been minted before, lazy mint a new one with parameters fetched from the data source and send it to `msg.sender` > - Return the IPFS metadata > - Add some buttons that allow manipulations for the NFT (e.g. viewing (reading) metadata (e.g. image/video files, graphs). > - Graphs should be generated in a Jupyter notebook and returned in the Next app. > - User creates post (proposal [Proposal Board → Migration from Vite](https://www.notion.so/Proposal-Board-Migration-from-Vite-2e3ef95e384d4ac1875e0dbbe9a59337)) with the NFT ID for their anomaly and some extra metadata for their discoveries and proposal, and then users can vote > > ## Planet/Node candidates > > (Where node refers to any type/class/collection of object that is part of the classification process. E.g. the TESS planets collection, mining/seismic data collection, etc) > Simple flow: Contract for unconfirmed planet → created via Deepnote flask > Once confirmed → lazy mint on existing goerli contract > Mining multitool helper > > # PlanetContractAddress > > Address for the collection of planets/node candidates that have been confirmed and lazy-minted. > The process for this in the Star Sailors wrapper is as follows: > > 1. Player mints an anomaly, which is an ERC1155 drop that is lazy-minted. The player requests a new planet, a random TIC id is assigned, our Flask API on Deepnote searches for an NFT in the first drop with that TIC ID. If none is found, a new NFT is lazy minted on that collection with data from the Lightkurve python module. > 2. User/Player then has a candidate (unconfirmed node object) in their wallet and on the web application frontend, they're redirected to a special planet `{...id}` page where they can interact with and view the candidate. > 3. Once the user has made a decision as to the status of the node candidate, they then create a Proposal (first on the [threaded comments via Supabase](https://www.notion.so/Threaded-Comments-8374255ed9314473b044db150fb13c36) and then on [Lens](https://github.com/signal-k/client)). The contents of this proposal are [outlined here](https://www.notion.so/Threaded-Comments-8374255ed9314473b044db150fb13c36). > 4. An NFT of this proposal is minted and then a new NFT is lazy minted from [this collection](notion://www.notion.so/skinetics/0xdf35Bb26d9AAD05EeC5183c6288f13c0136A7b43) (**note -> this is a demo. Will be updated). This new lazy-minted NFT will contain a link to the candidate node the proposal was created from, the proposal, and all the traits the user has filled in for the node once they have been cross-referenced with the proposal, voters and the python module that has the dataset (in this case, Lightkurve on Deepnote). This collection is the one referenced to in this contract (`planetNftCollectionAddress`). This planet can then have actions performed on it and rewards/items generated via [the minerals contract](notion://www.notion.so/skinetics/0xE938775F4ee4913470905885c9744C7FAD482991). Threads docs: https://skinetics.notion.site/Threaded-Comments-8374255ed9314473b044db150fb13c36
Gizmotronn
added a commit
to Gizmotronn/comments
that referenced
this issue
Jan 17, 2023
…cloud Supabase instance Next step -> creating frontend component for users to update their profile information from (will merge with Signal-K/client@7d5dd61 contents later) Signal-K/sytizen#16 More styling issues in both `/test` and the root vite app - overlapping with Signal-K/client#12 Signal-K/client#9 Signal-K/client#8
Gizmotronn
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 28, 2023
Also fixed profile styling issue on my Lens profile (#7 #8 #9 #10 #11 #12): https://www.notion.so/skinetics/Threaded-Comments-2nd-iteration-flow-475d8a2328be4be8a1403256f094790e#61f363eddac74572b243ebb0c9c6513a Signal-K/sytizen#16
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Examples:
Firstly, comments shouldn't show up on the post feed -> they should show up below posts.
This is a rendering issue where the individual lines in the codesnippet are quite long and stretch out further than the width of the screen (let alone the container they're supposed to be contained in). Likely will need to edit
components/PostFeed.tsxAnother issue that has come up here is that now the sidebar isn't able to be interacted with on my profile page, which houses the large comment. At first I thought this could be the result of some dependency mixups (I'm adding some new features, see commit below) but the sidebar works fine on the index page and on other profiles without this overlap error. So let's try and figure out a way to filter out/minimise large posts
Related to #8 #9
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: