The types aren't compatible with CommonJS #1137

aduth · 2020-03-27T21:15:18Z

Describe the bug

Node.js version: v12.13.0
OS & version: macOS Catalina 10.15.3

Standard usage of the default export got as a callable expression yields a type error in TypeScript "This expression is not callable".

Possible factors include:

Type-checking JavaScript code
Importing using CommonJS

I observe in the generated types...

The default export is import("./create").Got
Got is interface extends Record, not a function (source)

Possibly the types generated are not able to correctly detect type from the creation of the default export here:

got/source/index.ts

Line 115 in 5c74084

const got = create(defaults);

Actual behavior

index.js:5:25 - error TS2349: This expression is not callable.
  Type 'typeof import("/Users/andrew/Desktop/got-bug/node_modules/got/dist/source/index")' has no call signatures.

5     console.log( (await got(ISS, { json: true })).body.iss_position );
                          ~~~


Found 1 error.

Expected behavior

(No type errors)

Code to reproduce

package.json

{
  "name": "got-bug",
  "version": "1.0.0",
  "scripts": {
    "test": "tsc --allowJs --checkJs --noEmit index.js"
  },
  "devDependencies": {
    "typescript": "^3.8.3"
  },
  "dependencies": {
    "got": "^10.7.0"
  }
}

index.js

(Code based on the Runkit example. Note: The current example appears to be broken, based on json: true needing to be responseType: 'json')

const got = require("got");
const ISS = "http://api.open-notify.org/iss-now.json";

(async() => {
    console.log( (await got(ISS, { responseType: 'json' })).body.iss_position );
})();

Checklist

I have read the documentation.
I have tried my code with the latest version of Node.js and Got.

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

szmarczak · 2020-03-28T12:09:20Z

#1072

szmarczak · 2020-03-28T12:09:58Z

Got is interface extends Record, not a function (source)

You forgot that it also extends GotRequestMethod, which is a function.

szmarczak · 2020-03-28T12:10:16Z

What TypeScript version are you using?

aduth · 2020-03-30T01:00:14Z

Got is interface extends Record, not a function (source)

You forgot that it also extends GotRequestMethod, which is a function.

Oops, right you are! I did miss that.

What TypeScript version are you using?

I am using the latest version of both Got (10.7.0) and TypeScript (3.8.3).

Outside the default configuration, I've tried a few additional options to see if anything helps, to no avail unfortunately (--esModuleInterop, --allowSyntheticDefaultImports, --moduleResolution).

Based on the error message and what else I've been able to find of it, not sure if it might have something to do with it being unable to match any of the signatures of GotRequestMethod, especially with untyped / duck typed JavaScript. I tried a few variations, again with no luck:

Revise GotRequestMethod to define a very liberal call signature.
Revise the JavaScript implementation to (a) only pass string and (b) define variable type explicitly as string /** @type {string} */ ( 'https://...' ).

To be clear, I'm just throwing ideas out there based on my attempts to resolve this. Not sure if any of it is applicable. To me, it seems like the minimal code example in the original comment should be sufficient to work without errors.

szmarczak · 2020-03-30T14:13:01Z

Please set up an example repository.

ties-s · 2020-03-30T21:44:51Z

Running into this issue as well

szmarczak · 2020-03-31T09:34:47Z

@ties-s

Please set up an example repository.

I cannot reproduce this.

aduth · 2020-03-31T12:10:27Z

@szmarczak Would a CodeSandbox demo work?

https://codesandbox.io/s/js-typescript-got-demo-qirz5

Ignoring the preview, and waiting a moment for the dependencies to load, you should see the inline error when got is invoked:

aduth · 2020-04-01T13:43:00Z

Also not sure if this is related, but I was encountering a very similar error when using an older version of the chalk package (2.4.x) which was resolved by upgrading to the latest version (3.0.0). I tracked it back to the changes at chalk/chalk#344 and a related comment at sindresorhus/meta#9 (comment) . May be a pattern to follow there?

szmarczak · 2020-04-01T15:16:09Z

@aduth Why are you trying to run Got in a browser sandbox? Got doesn't support browsers.

szmarczak · 2020-04-01T15:16:51Z

Please set up a GitHub respository so I can just clone and look what's wrong.

szmarczak · 2020-04-01T15:21:30Z

Please try replacing

export default got;

// For CommonJS default export support
module.exports = got;
module.exports.default = got;

export * from './create';
export * from './as-promise';

with

export = got;

then recompile Got and try again.

szmarczak · 2020-04-01T15:24:12Z

Also why are you running tsc on a non-TypeScript file?

Caerbannog · 2020-04-01T15:57:21Z

Also why are you running tsc on a non-TypeScript file?

This is useful when migrating a large javascript codebase to typescript bit-by-bit with the allowJs option of tsc.

aduth · 2020-04-01T16:56:29Z

I've pushed a repository including a minimal reproducible case here:

https://github.com/aduth/tmp-got-types-demo

Reproduce by:

npm install
npm test

@aduth Why are you trying to run Got in a browser sandbox? Got doesn't support browsers.

CodeSandbox can interpret the TypeScript configuration, which is what I'd intended to demonstrate with the inline error reporting. The runtime of the code itself isn't particularly relevant for the problem.

Also why are you running tsc on a non-TypeScript file?

As @Caerbannog mentioned, it's a supported feature of TypeScript:

https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/type-checking-javascript-files.html

Please try replacing [...] then recompile Got and try again.

I can check this later and report back with the results.

Caerbannog · 2020-04-01T17:09:04Z

As a workaround I migrated to typescript the few .js files in my project that used got, and everything is now working fine.
It's not a general solution for bigger projects, though.

szmarczak · 2020-04-01T17:45:21Z

I can check this later and report back with the results

That'd be awesome.

aduth · 2020-04-01T22:11:23Z

Please try replacing

I had some success with this, though the changes as proposed weren't quite as easy to implement. I'm not sure if code you referenced is from a version older than that of the current master, but it presently looks like this for exported members in index.ts:

got/source/index.ts

Lines 117 to 161 in 74d66b2

    
           export default got; 
        
           // For CommonJS default export support 
        
           module.exports = got; 
        
           module.exports.default = got; 
        
           // Export types 
        
           export * from './types'; 
        
           export { 
        
           	Got, 
        
           	GotStream, 
        
           	ReturnStream, 
        
           	GotRequestMethod, 
        
           	GotReturn 
        
           } from './create'; 
        
           export { 
        
           	ProxyStream as ResponseStream 
        
           } from './as-stream'; 
        
           export { 
        
           	GotError, 
        
           	CacheError, 
        
           	RequestError, 
        
           	ReadError, 
        
           	ParseError, 
        
           	HTTPError, 
        
           	MaxRedirectsError, 
        
           	UnsupportedProtocolError, 
        
           	TimeoutError, 
        
           	CancelError 
        
           } from './errors'; 
        
           export { 
        
           	InitHook, 
        
           	BeforeRequestHook, 
        
           	BeforeRedirectHook, 
        
           	BeforeRetryHook, 
        
           	BeforeErrorHook, 
        
           	AfterResponseHook, 
        
           	HookType, 
        
           	Hooks, 
        
           	HookEvent 
        
           } from './known-hook-events';

Ultimately, it did seem to be resolved by using export = got;, but since export = can not be alongside other export statements, and those other export can't be removed directly (build will fail), I had to create a new entrypoint whose sole contents were:

import got from './index-original';
export = got;

This built fine, fixed the error in my JavaScript project, and provided the type hints I'd hope for.

I can open a pull request if you'd like, or leave it to you or another maintainer, as I expect it might need some further thought on how these files are structured if there needs to be the one entrypoint with one export =.

aduth · 2020-04-01T22:12:54Z

As a workaround I migrated to typescript the few .js files in my project that used got, and everything is now working fine.
It's not a general solution for bigger projects, though.

Aside: I use the TypeScript tooling in quite a few of my JavaScript projects, with no plans to adopt TypeScript the language. I'd consider it a perfectly valid use-case, in addition to the scenario you describe.

eaviles · 2021-02-09T20:43:06Z

Having the same issue but when trying to call got.extend on a JS codebase. I ended up overriding the type definition shipped with the module.

eaviles · 2021-02-11T00:09:54Z

Having the same issue but when trying to call got.extend on a JS codebase. I ended up overriding the type definition shipped with the module.

By the way, I managed to get around this by doing:

const { default: got } = require('got');
got.extend({ … });

szmarczak · 2021-04-13T22:34:24Z

Fixed in #1667

szmarczak changed the title ~~TypeScript Types: Default export "This expression is not callable" (CommonJS, JavaScript)~~ The types aren't compatible with CommonJS Apr 2, 2020

szmarczak added the bug Something does not work as it should label Apr 2, 2020

szmarczak added the ✭ help wanted ✭ label Apr 15, 2020

szmarczak added this to the Got v12 milestone May 4, 2020

oppilate mentioned this issue Dec 25, 2020

[WIP]Use useragent module to keep it updated DIYgod/RSSHub#6444

Closed

sindresorhus removed this from the Got v12 milestone Jan 5, 2021

sindresorhus mentioned this issue Jan 22, 2021

Any plan/interest to rewrite in TypeScript? sindresorhus/ky#321

Closed

szmarczak mentioned this issue Mar 21, 2021

Got 12 improvements #1667

Merged

71 tasks

szmarczak mentioned this issue Apr 13, 2021

Rewrite docs #1684

Closed

13 tasks

szmarczak closed this as completed Apr 13, 2021

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

The types aren't compatible with CommonJS #1137

The types aren't compatible with CommonJS #1137

aduth commented Mar 27, 2020 •

edited

Loading

szmarczak commented Mar 28, 2020

szmarczak commented Mar 28, 2020

szmarczak commented Mar 28, 2020

aduth commented Mar 30, 2020

szmarczak commented Mar 30, 2020

ties-s commented Mar 30, 2020

szmarczak commented Mar 31, 2020

aduth commented Mar 31, 2020

aduth commented Apr 1, 2020 •

edited

Loading

szmarczak commented Apr 1, 2020

szmarczak commented Apr 1, 2020

szmarczak commented Apr 1, 2020

szmarczak commented Apr 1, 2020

Caerbannog commented Apr 1, 2020

aduth commented Apr 1, 2020

Caerbannog commented Apr 1, 2020

szmarczak commented Apr 1, 2020

aduth commented Apr 1, 2020

aduth commented Apr 1, 2020

eaviles commented Feb 9, 2021

eaviles commented Feb 11, 2021

szmarczak commented Apr 13, 2021

The types aren't compatible with CommonJS #1137

The types aren't compatible with CommonJS #1137

Comments

aduth commented Mar 27, 2020 • edited Loading

Describe the bug

Actual behavior

Expected behavior

Code to reproduce

Checklist

szmarczak commented Mar 28, 2020

szmarczak commented Mar 28, 2020

szmarczak commented Mar 28, 2020

aduth commented Mar 30, 2020

szmarczak commented Mar 30, 2020

ties-s commented Mar 30, 2020

szmarczak commented Mar 31, 2020

aduth commented Mar 31, 2020

aduth commented Apr 1, 2020 • edited Loading

szmarczak commented Apr 1, 2020

szmarczak commented Apr 1, 2020

szmarczak commented Apr 1, 2020

szmarczak commented Apr 1, 2020

Caerbannog commented Apr 1, 2020

aduth commented Apr 1, 2020

Caerbannog commented Apr 1, 2020

szmarczak commented Apr 1, 2020

aduth commented Apr 1, 2020

aduth commented Apr 1, 2020

eaviles commented Feb 9, 2021

eaviles commented Feb 11, 2021

szmarczak commented Apr 13, 2021

aduth commented Mar 27, 2020 •

edited

Loading

aduth commented Apr 1, 2020 •

edited

Loading