Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[c++] Final rename SOMA_READER -> SOMA_ARRAY_READER #1201

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 30, 2023
Merged

Conversation

johnkerl
Copy link
Member

One more following on #1191

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Patch coverage has no change and project coverage change: -14.13 ⚠️

Comparison is base (38987dc) 64.96% compared to head (860e69d) 50.84%.

❗ Current head 860e69d differs from pull request most recent head 08b379e. Consider uploading reports for the commit 08b379e to get more accurate results

📣 This organization is not using Codecov’s GitHub App Integration. We recommend you install it so Codecov can continue to function properly for your repositories. Learn more

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1201       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   64.96%   50.84%   -14.13%     
===========================================
  Files          91       61       -30     
  Lines        6737     4380     -2357     
===========================================
- Hits         4377     2227     -2150     
+ Misses       2360     2153      -207     
Flag Coverage Δ
python ?
r 50.84% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 30 files with indirect coverage changes

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

Copy link
Member

@eddelbuettel eddelbuettel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:shipit:

@@ -374,4 +374,4 @@ class SOMAArrayReader {

} // namespace tiledbsoma

#endif
#endif // SOMA_ARRAY_READER
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

idk how people feel about this comment after #endif but it's a long-held personal preference of mine ...

https://github.com/johnkerl/scripts/blame/main/fundam/hdrtop

Copy link
Member Author

@johnkerl johnkerl Mar 30, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@eddelbuettel sorry to be cryptic.

Just an 11-year-old script which shows that every time I create a header file I want to do :.!hdrtop % in vim which makes

#ifndef FOO_H
#define FOO_H

#endif // FOO_H

showing that I've had this stylistic preference for long enough to have automated around it. :)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Superflouous at the end of a file like this that has one and only exactly one header guard.

But in principle I like comments at the end of long and nested 'end' or closing brackets.

Lastly for the case of header guards: the cool kids switched to #pragma once to not have this problem

Very lastly too minor an issue to worry. But if you feel strongly about it and have the urge to touch umpteen files go for it.

@johnkerl
Copy link
Member Author

@eddelbuettel :shipit: == 🚢 ?

@eddelbuettel
Copy link
Member

Yes I learned about :shipit: here years ago. Apparently it is a thing:

https://www.google.com/search?q=shipit+squirrel+meaning&oq=shipit+squirrel

@johnkerl
Copy link
Member Author

Yes I learned about :shipit: here years ago. Apparently it is a thing:

Sorry to be cryptic -- I should have said: given that you did :shipit: , can you accept the PR?

@johnkerl
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks @eddelbuettel !!

@johnkerl johnkerl merged commit aadb054 into main Mar 30, 2023
6 checks passed
@johnkerl johnkerl deleted the kerl/nevermore branch March 30, 2023 23:10
@eddelbuettel
Copy link
Member

Yepper! Sorry about that -- was long day and I meant to 'shipit comment and approve_ and only managed the first part. Now fixed!

Thanks for cleaning up in any and all dark corners.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants