Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

bip-tapscript: CSA-based multisig is in many practical cases more efficient than key trees without MuSig #98

Closed
sipa opened this issue Oct 19, 2019 · 1 comment · Fixed by #109
Closed

bip-tapscript: CSA-based multisig is in many practical cases more efficient than key trees without MuSig #98

sipa opened this issue Oct 19, 2019 · 1 comment · Fixed by #109

Comments

@sipa
Copy link
Owner

sipa commented Oct 19, 2019

Review comment by @gmaxwell.
@sipa sipa mentioned this issue Oct 21, 2019
Merged
@sipa
Copy link
Owner Author

sipa commented Oct 21, 2019

See #109.

@sipa sipa changed the title bil-tapscript: CSA-based multisig is in many practical cases more efficient than key trees without MuSig bip-tapscript: CSA-based multisig is in many practical cases more efficient than key trees without MuSig Oct 21, 2019
@sipa sipa closed this as completed in #109 Oct 23, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Improve section on alternatives to OP_CHECKMULTISIG sipa/bips
1 participant
@sipa