Relicense under MPL/Apache/MIT

[dpc]

It was brought to my attention that MPL-2 might be slightly inconvenient, especially for core Rust ecosystem crate like slog that can span over many crates, and I think I agree, so I've decided to relicense the core crate and add Apache and MIT explicitly.

I hope everyone that contributed to slog will understand and approve my decision. If not, please contact me.

Sorry for the noise, and thank everyone for your contributions!

@zsiciarz @alex-gulyas @BourgondAries @tmccombs @whipsch @tshepang @seeekr @compressed @ayoshi @loggerhead

[tshepang]

am good with this

[tmccombs]

I approve.

[zsiciarz]

I approve as well.

[compressed]

I approve.

[ayoshi]

I haven't contributed much yet, though working on it: https://github.com/ayoshi/syslog/tree/develop, so I don’t think I should voice an opinion, besides don’t really have one, as long as it’s not xGPLxxx

…

On May 12, 2017, 3:21 PM +0300, compressed ***@***.***>, wrote: I approve. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

[drake-amz]

@dpc, would you mind explicitly confirming that "MPL/Apache/MIT" means "MPL or Apache or MIT"?

[dpc]

@drake-amz

I confirm. Could it mean anything else?

[drake-amz]

Thanks!

Could it mean anything else?

I wouldn't think so - just checking boxes :)