You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
currently, those values will be assigned to '0' - albeit, the analysis as it is done right now for this case is wrong (i.e. there are no *.keyword fields for upper paths available). hence, it might be better to write 'n/a' into these cells. furthermore, calculating the occurrence and or cardinality for those upper paths does not really make sense in genernal (i.e. I think that these statistics are only interesting for concrete values (instead of sub trees of a record (as it is the case for upper path analysis))).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
currently, those values will be assigned to '0' - albeit, the analysis as it is done right now for this case is wrong (i.e. there are no *.keyword fields for upper paths available). hence, it might be better to write 'n/a' into these cells. furthermore, calculating the occurrence and or cardinality for those upper paths does not really make sense in genernal (i.e. I think that these statistics are only interesting for concrete values (instead of sub trees of a record (as it is the case for upper path analysis))).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: