Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

mark values for 'occurrence' and 'unique (appr.)' as 'n/a' for upper paths #3

Open
zazi opened this issue Apr 12, 2018 · 0 comments
Open
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@zazi
Copy link
Contributor

zazi commented Apr 12, 2018

currently, those values will be assigned to '0' - albeit, the analysis as it is done right now for this case is wrong (i.e. there are no *.keyword fields for upper paths available). hence, it might be better to write 'n/a' into these cells. furthermore, calculating the occurrence and or cardinality for those upper paths does not really make sense in genernal (i.e. I think that these statistics are only interesting for concrete values (instead of sub trees of a record (as it is the case for upper path analysis))).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant