Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 1, 2018. It is now read-only.

Use rollup instead of webpack for small modules #40

Closed
lucat1 opened this issue Oct 1, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

Use rollup instead of webpack for small modules #40

lucat1 opened this issue Oct 1, 2017 · 1 comment
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@lucat1
Copy link
Collaborator

lucat1 commented Oct 1, 2017

This will lower and speed up the build process. And luckily fix the errors that we're getting in the CI builds. Plus rollup provides and amazing es6 configuration and a really tiny footprint, with blazing-fast performance. We'd also replace it in the demo if it supports chunk splitting! 🎉

This implementation would actually lower the size BY A LOT, especially when using polished:

What is "tree-shaking?"

Tree-shaking, also known as "live code inclusion," is the process of eliminating code that is not actually used in a given project. It is similar to dead code elimination but can be much more efficient.

The major reason for this is shrinking the size even further

@lucat1 lucat1 added this to the v0.2 milestone Oct 1, 2017
@lucat1 lucat1 self-assigned this Oct 1, 2017
@lucat1 lucat1 removed the CI label Oct 1, 2017
@lucat1
Copy link
Collaborator Author

lucat1 commented Oct 13, 2017

Handling in #48

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant