You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Might be a good idea to have the resources declare their preferred proxy URL. This is so that, proxy URLs can be discovered without hardcoding or maintaining the URLs in the application. That is, the application only needs to find the value of the property, and then use the prefix URL.
It is okay to try and use ,proxy?uri= in applications, but I think that expectation is not necessarily always going to work out in the wild. Servers are going to use whatever pattern they can and want. And, it is likely that they'll re-use an existing one instead of changing its path to a new one so that it is compatible with Solid - which is costly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think applications are better placed to make decisions about which proxy to use than resource owners are. And applications are going to be more likely to keep this up to date if proxies die etc because the function of the app could depend on it.
Hmm, makes sense. I think I'm also conflating the role of a server and the resource here. It makes sense that the proxy is discovered at a server (perhaps through a resource), but it doesn't make sense that the resource needs to declare that. So, perhaps this is not that interesting. And, now I agree that it is better to leave it off for the application. I just cringe every time I hardcode anything into my code and look for a way in which things can be discovered by themselves.
Might be a good idea to have the resources declare their preferred proxy URL. This is so that, proxy URLs can be discovered without hardcoding or maintaining the URLs in the application. That is, the application only needs to find the value of the property, and then use the prefix URL.
Example part of the response:
and/or:
Example part of the HTTP Header:
It is okay to try and use
,proxy?uri=
in applications, but I think that expectation is not necessarily always going to work out in the wild. Servers are going to use whatever pattern they can and want. And, it is likely that they'll re-use an existing one instead of changing its path to a new one so that it is compatible with Solid - which is costly.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: