Document proposal for acl:agentClass acl:PayingAgent #100
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do you think it would help to go through an issue/discussion or this is ready as proposal?
Below is not intended to knock off what's proposed (it could even be combined), just want to raise awareness as a comment:
I think we should look into how ODRL policies can be loosely coupled with the authorization system. Payment-for-authorization is one aspect, but there are many others. For example, see section on Duty property with a Permission https://www.w3.org/TR/odrl-model/#duty-perm .
Brought this up awhile back in solid/authorization-panel#55, solid/data-interoperability-panel#31 , solid/specification#116 (ctrl-f "odrl").
See also: w3c/odrl#12
ah yes, that was a copy-paste typo. thanks! Co-authored-by: Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca>
|
Yes, this proposal is ready in its status as a proposal, that's why I added it to that separate folder and not created a PR on the main spec text. I implemented it in NSS as an experiment and proof-of-concept, but I do not expect the other servers to implement it unless we see some traction for it in the wild. Note that if support for W3C-VC is added to WAC then this proposal becomes obsolete, because the ACL could just state that a verifiable "receipt of payment" credential is required, and the client could then just present their payment receipt as a "ticket" that gives them access. Rather than a "ticket" system, the Re ODRL, yes, I think @joepio is working with ODRL in the context of Solid Webmonetization. I tried to document the current situation in https://github.com/solid/webmonetization#requiring-payment-for-resources The concept 'paying agent' is left intentionally vague; it is implied that the user could pay to get access, but how much they should pay, how long the access would last, and what bundle options would exist to pay once for access to multiple (related) resources, is left out of scope in this proposal, I don't think that level of detail would belong in WAC. |
As per nodeSolidServer/acl-check#38 (review)