Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Perfomance issue #5

Closed
wh1t3tea opened this issue Jun 11, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Perfomance issue #5

wh1t3tea opened this issue Jun 11, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@wh1t3tea
Copy link

wh1t3tea commented Jun 11, 2024

What's performance difference between "base" and other configs? Can I get results with bigvsan_base_22khz_80band.json like you provide with bigvsan_24khz_100band.json?

@wh1t3tea wh1t3tea changed the title Perfomancee Perfomance issue Jun 11, 2024
@TakashiShibuyaSony
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you for having an interest in our work.

To be honest, we've never trained a model with base configs. We just inherited some config files from the BigVGAN repository (BigVGAN is the model that our BigVSAN is based on).

I believe that, even if we train a BigVSAN model with a base config, it will outperform its BigVGAN counterpart. But, from our experiences, BigVGAN and BigVSAN are data-hungry. If a dataset is not so large, a result might be unsatisfactory.

Does this answer your question?

@wh1t3tea
Copy link
Author

Yeah, thank you

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants