Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

--union command-line argument for table-generator #977

Open
PhilippWendler opened this issue Nov 23, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

--union command-line argument for table-generator #977

PhilippWendler opened this issue Nov 23, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@PhilippWendler
Copy link
Member

As long as one has a list of result files that should be put next to each other in the table, one can call table-generator without an XML table definition, which is very convenient. However, if one was a list of result files that should be put below each other in the table (as with the <union> tag in a table definition) there is no convenient way to do this. While it is not meaningful to provide a command-line argument for every possible table structure, this use case seems easy to cover with a --union argument that makes table-generator behave as if all given result files were present in a <union> tag.

Example command lines:

table-generator --union foo.results.taskset1.xml.bz2 foo.results.taskset2.xml.bz2
table-generator -x table-definition-with-only-coluumns.xml --union foo.results.taskset1.xml.bz2 foo.results.taskset2.xml.bz2
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant