-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cody: Rename extension to Cody AI by Sourcegraph #51702
Conversation
I like it. Not sure who's the decision-maker in this. @malomarrec maybe? |
Also @iskyOS and @ebrodymoore here, because it's important from a marketing perspective whether we call it "Cody" or "Sourcegraph Cody" |
I think there was a thread where we switched from Cody to Sourcegraph Cody because there are multiple "Cody" on the marketplace. (Not sure if that still matters though but just for context) |
We can also put Sourcegraph as the first word in the description, something like "
But to be honest I think the author name is pretty prominent already. I’m more worried that people are confused this way because we appear fourth in the list. "Is this even legit?" |
cc @gwestersf too |
Decision as per this internal thread is to call it "Cody AI by Sourcegraph" |
Paging @sourcegraph/cody for review now that we have a conclusion on the name! |
Consistency with #51789 and #51702 This PR changes the name of the other VS Code extension from "Sourcegraph" to "Search by Sourcegraph" for consistency with he new Cody naming schema. The activity bars are now called "Sourcegraph Search" and "Sourcegraph Cody" (the latter is already called like this in the current release so this is not a change) ## Test plan https://github.com/sourcegraph/sourcegraph/assets/458591/84300e12-538c-46e9-afd9-2972608630c4 <!-- All pull requests REQUIRE a test plan: https://docs.sourcegraph.com/dev/background-information/testing_principles -->
RFC to rename the extension and the tab form "Sourcegraph Cody" to just "Cody AI by Sourcegraph"
The intention is that we show up in the search first :) Sourcegraph is mentioned as the author anyways so I don’t think it’s super useful here.
Test plan
Now we're back at